Integration of ICT in English Classrooms in Iran: Affordances and Problems

by Soroor Ashtarian, PhD student 

Razi University

sashtarian@yahoo.co.uk

Keywords: ICT, EFL teachers, ICT use, Factors

 

Bio Data

Soroor Ashtarian is an English teacher with an experience of over 17 years of teaching in high schools and pre-university institutes in Kermanshah, Iran. She accomplished her masters in TESOL & ICT (Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages and Communication and Information Technology) at the University of Leeds, UK and is currently doing her PhD at Razi University, Iran. Her research interests are integrating ICT in language teaching, strategic teaching of language skills. collaborative learning, and dynamic assessment.

 

Abstract

The current paper is a report on the second phase of an MA thesis which reveals the reasons behind the emerging patterns of ICT use by Iranian EFL teachers in semi-structured interviews. In this phase of the study, factors that have an impact on Iranian EFL teachers’ ICT use in school are explored which include class time, human resources, physical resources, resistance to change, role model, content of books and teachers’ attitudes. In fact, increased awareness of the current state would be helpful in understanding the status of technology in teaching languages in schools, finding ways to help teachers and get the education departments address the needs of the teachers and students regarding adoption of  technology.

 

  1. Introduction

Technology is arguably part of our modern life in today’s world and one cannot think of many aspects of our lives that do not rely on technology. Not too long ago, computers were merely used for analysis of large set of data by specialists. Nowadays, however, people from university professors to school kids have access to computers and should somehow be conversant with them (Cooper, 2006).

To count some of the advantages of using ICT, it should be mentioned that through using technology, teachers and students will have an array of tools available for acquiring knowledge, critical thinking and communicating with other colleagues and classmates and therefore more chance of being successful learners. Studies have shown that access to technology encourages more collaboration rather than isolation of learners as compared to traditional classrooms. It also engages learners more as they gain more knowledge and necessary skills to generate ideas and produce results. Over time they also develop positive attitudes toward themselves and their abilities. The classes in which technology is implemented can also accommodate different learning styles and encourage learner- centeredness in comparison to traditional classrooms in which teachers play the role of lecturers and source of knowledge provided that they are in good hands and are used according to the appropriate learning and teaching theories (Fisher et al, 1996).

Therefore, as mentioned above, integrating information and communication technology in education for the purpose of enhancing the quality of learning/ teaching has been of high status and subject of much research in many countries including Iran. One of the Iranian Ministry of Education’s central objectives is to address the question of how ICT can be used to enhance teaching and learning. Existing research in this area in Iran points to the failure of the programme in achieving its purpose that is promoting learning and teaching through ICT usage the reason for which is attributed to teachers’ lack of use of the implemented facilities (Zamani, 2010; Shahamat and Riazi, 2009).

 

  1. Review of the Related Literature

Proliferation of information and communication technology (ICT) in education over the past two decades has been part of the governments’ plans to revolutionize the educational system, prepare students for the digital era and also speed up the national development efforts. These promises have generated the requirement of embedding/integrating new digital tools in education (Pelgrum, 2001 in Albirini, 2006).

 

ICT has acquired a place in education in recent years in addition to other sectors of the society. Many applications have found their place in school subjects (e.g. programmes for drills). Moreover, a number of general programmes such as word processing, data base are being used as working, teaching, learning tools. More recently, email and Internet have found their way to schools and it seems ICT applications are replacing previous learning tools in a way that change the role of teachers from a mere transmitter of information to supporter and guide of students’ learning process (Heemskerk, 2005). Although there is limited evidence about the impact of ICT on improving learning, students appear to like to use ICT and are motivated by it (Maurer et al, 1999 in Heemskerk, 2005).

The results of studies by Zamani (2010) and Shahamat and Riazi (2009) point out that the uptake of ICT in teaching language in Iran is much lower than that of private institutes and most means of technology are rarely or almost never used/ heard of and that a limited number of teachers, mostly IT teachers, use them for educational purposes. Findings of a longitudinal study by Zamani (2010) revealed that in spite of increasing number of computers in schools since 1995-2005, a limited number of teachers, mainly IT teachers, use them for educational purposes. The reasons for this low rate of computer usage were identified as fear of breaking them and the subsequent cost of repairing, lack of relevant software, inadequate IT knowledge and competence of teachers, and limited support from the head-teachers. Zamani also reported the “language ability “of teachers as another important factor that hinders teachers from using computers in their teaching though she does not specify the subjects taught by those teachers or their major.

Considering the fact that teachers are the most important factor affecting the quality of education, vast investment should be done to provide them with practical knowledge necessary to play their part in enhancing the quality of education rather than ignoring them and focusing on the learners and their needs in spite of their being interconnected (Farhady et al 2010.).

 

2.1 ICT in Iran 

Governments of all countries all over the world including developing countries have made attempts to introduce ICT in education in the hope of attaining the goal of a more effective and improved quality teaching/learning.  The Iranian government is not an exception to this undertaking. In fact, the implementation of computers in Iranian society started in 1988 with a fast growth that resulted in diffusion of this innovation in Iranian high schools, though this latter is a relatively new phenomenon in Iranian context (Zamani, 2010). This computer diffusion began gradually starting as a pilot project in the big cities and for the purpose of teaching Mathematics major students in high schools some IT skills. The long- term intention was to implement IT courses for students of all majors. It is worth mentioning that since 1993 computers have been used in Iranian schools for administrative purposes (Zamani, 2010).        As a part of the government’s plans to integrate ICT into education, all high schools were equipped with computer rooms and in some cases internet connections. Teachers of all subjects have also been required to take part in in-service trainings to prepare for integration of the new innovation in education. In-service training opportunities for many teachers in different subject areas have been provided with the hope that teachers’ use of technology in education would improve the quality of teaching and learning, and increase their technological skills. Pertinent to this objective, annual national competitions on preparing ICT-based teaching material are also held to encourage integration of ICT in education among teachers. However, the results were not satisfying as expected. To investigate the reasons, this study was conducted to explore the patterns of ICT use by Iranian EFL teachers at home and school in the first phase (Ashtarian, 2012) and the factors affecting ICT use by teachers in the second phase which is reported in the present paper.

 

2.2 Factors encouraging/preventing teachers to use ICT

Previous research on ICT integration in education has shown, factors such as level of training, the amount of ICT resources, availability of a supportive network in school, and computer phobia, are among the variables that affect the uptake of ICT in schools. Other factors contributing to ICT use in teaching are ability to use ICT, the difficulties teachers might have encountered in using it, the extent of the resources availability and their satisfaction with IT, and whether using it in teaching is enjoyable and interesting, class time, low level of teachers’ access to school computers and lack of computer competence, , loyalty and perceived culture of organization, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, school or district expectation of level of ICT use, and teachers’ personal expectation of technology use (Jedeskog, 1988, Ferndaha 2002 in Ma et al, 2005; Cox et al, 1991; Selwyn 1997 in Cox et al, 1999; Albirini, 2006; Hammond et al 2009; Abas 1995; Al-Oteawi 2002 in Albirini, 2006; Legris et al 2003 in Ma et al, 2005; Bullock, 2004 ).

Studies conducted so far indicate that though teachers value the potential benefits of ICT, they do not make use of it to enhance the quality of teaching/learning for various reasons (Smeets, 2005).They have some reservations about using ICT rooms and prefer incidental use of ICT as a “component of a lesson, in an ordinary teaching room” (p, 264) because there are too many students, they need assistant, equipment is not reliable, there’s control issues, booking the room in advance is not easy and you should plan it ahead (Barton et al, 2006).

 

  1. Methodology

3.1. Participants

The participants in this study were Iranian EFL teachers of three different districts of Kermanshah where the researcher used to be an English teacher for over 17 years. EFL teachers were selected as the subjects of this study because of their familiarity with English as the main language of computer and software. Previous studies had also reported language ability of teachers of other subjects as one of the factors hindering them from using computers in their teaching (Zamani 2010). As the population size of EFL teachers in this level in the city where this study was conducted was limited, about 120 teachers at the time, men and women, the population and the sample were the same.

3.3 Data Collection

3.3.1 Interview

This phase of the study was carried out through using semi- structured interview. A variety of information can be obtained through conducting semi- structured interview. These include a) factual information about participants’ circumstances b) information about their opinions/ preferences c) information about their experiences, motivation and reasoning (Drever, 2003).  Since I was based in Leeds in the UK for the purpose of pursuing my higher education and it was not feasible for me to go back to Iran to conduct the interview, the semi-structured interview in this study was conducted on Skype and in some cases where it was not possible for the interviewees to download Skype due to Internet connection problem or lack of access to computer it was done over the phone. Therefore lots of features which are present in face to face interview such as facial expression, gesture and posture were missing. It is worth mentioning that I used video call to conduct the interview on Skype, however none of the interviewees had access to webcam.

Prior to conducting the interview, an interview schedule was prepared the purpose of which was to help the researcher avoid drying up, or missing questions. The interview schedule was mainly based on the research questions which indicated the types of information I needed to collect.

To find out which questions worked and which did not, the time each interview took and to evaluate my ability to make the schedule work, I piloted the interview with one of the teachers who had the same characteristics as the sample but at the same time was not part of the study. The pilot interview was conducted on Skype and gave me an idea of how I might handle the interview considering the missing features as mentioned above.

 

  1. Results and Discussion
    • The respondents

The respondents were male and female Iranian EFL teachers teaching at the high schools and pre-university institutes of a city called Kermanshah in the West part of Iran where the researcher used to be a teacher herself. Of 56 respondents 83.3 % (40) were female as compared to 16.7% (8) male teachers. There were 8 missing data regarding the gender. The largest number of the respondents were aged between 36- 40 (34.7%) and were mostly from district 3 as this educational district covers vaster area of the city thus accommodating for more schools and therefore more teachers. The large majority of the respondents (36%) had between 11- 15 years experience of teaching and they mainly held BA in TEFL that is 80%. About 73.3% of the teachers had IT training out of which 52. 8% had more than 30 hours training in IT through in- service courses.

  • Factors affecting integration of ICT in the classroom

 

4.2.1 ClassTime

All interviewees mentioned time as the main barrier to ICT use at school. They referred to the limited number of class hours allocated to teaching English as a factor stopping them from taking their students to computer room and using ICT for the purpose of teaching. This is in line with the findings of studies by Albirini (2006), Hammond (2006), Eifler et al (2001 in Kay, 2007) which all found class time to be the main barrier to ICT use.

Mona, 36 who uses computer and internet quite frequently for purposes such as typing, finding information, chatting to others,…expresses this time pressure as:

” you know we’ve got just 3 hours a week for year one , two hours for year 2 and 3…actually…

in reality each so- called 2 hours is just 80 minutes in practice not more”.

 

4.2.2 Workload

The need for working two shifts to be able to put the bread on the family table was mentioned as a factor limiting teachers’ time thus discouraging them from learning about computers and using it in their classes or even at home. This was seen among the men rather the women as in Iran men are responsible for the costs of living and teachers are among the low-paid groups that puts the pressure on men and makes them overwork. Work overload as one of the barriers to ICT use is consistent with the findings of the study by Hammond (2002) in which the main source of dissatisfaction of all members of the group that is teachers who were the subjects of the study was work overload as a result of the demands of students’ coursework. As noted here, the work overload in the present study is because of double shifts which makes it somehow different from Hammond’s study where students’ course work creates overwork for teachers.

One of the male respondent’s comments regarding ICT use at home/school was as follows:

“ Nearly all the teachers in Iran have to work all day long to make a living…Accordingly, teachers don’t have enough time to have a rest, let alone use Internet to keep up to date with the latest news around the world”

A female very low user explains her reason for not using ICT at home/school as:

“…the overloaded school programme and housework routine doesn’t let us use computers at home/school”.

This finding implies that the teachers are quite willing to integrate ICT in their classes, however, the contextual factors and also some individual reasons prevent them from doing so regarding the contextual factors.

 

4.2.3 Training

a) Teacher training

Not having the opportunity to participate in the in- service trainings or the low quality of the courses were mentioned as training barriers to ICT use. Cox (1999), Selwyn (1997), Hammond (2006) are among the studies referring to training as another barrier to ICT use.

Mehri, 34 who has some training but still does not feel confident about using computers said:  “ Actually there was one in service course that I was aware of… it was just theoretical, plenty of things to read and nothing practical…later on there were practical courses which I couldn’t attend because of my child’s birth… others who took the course said they hadn’t learned much”.  One reason for the inefficiency of the in-service trainings was mentioned to be lack of intrinsic motivation of teachers to take part in the training courses. One interviewee pointed out that teachers mostly attend the course for the score that they receive because of attending it. They do not care if they learn anything or not. This is in contrast with the finding regarding work load and teachers’ willingness to integrate ICT in their classes. It seems to me that work load is just an excuse for those running away from new technology and innovation because of some other reasons such as resistance or fear of technology rather than work load. This is based on my experience of working in the same context where I could see teachers squeezing themselves in the limited list of the participants in the training courses in spite of their so-called workload.

One of the interviewees referred to the training as sufficient and useful as she believed it covered everything, though she was self-trained herself. She had heard about the courses from other colleagues.

b) Student Training

Regarding training, students’ lack of IT skills was reported as another factor hindering teachers from ICT use which as far as I am concerned none of the studies reviewed for the purpose of this study have referred to. The reason for this could be the fact that in most countries students start working and learning about computers at early years of school thus by the time they reach the secondary schools none of these problems regarding training and IT skills exist. Leila, who is 27 and holds BA in English literature, was initially employed as an English teacher in one the towns near Kermanshah but when she was transferred to the capital (Kermanshah) she couldn’t get a teaching position and became responsible for the IT room in one of the schools. Considering student training she said:

“Students’ IT skills vary depending on their home access and private classes… Some majors have a subject called Basic Computer Skills so they work more on computers and are better but mostly are not”

Tina who teaches in non-profit schools ( schools run by the education departments which require students to pay for the services) referred to students’ IT skills as enough and satisfactory explaining that nowadays they have access to computer at home and attend private computer classes.

Mehri who teaches in a vocational school had a different opinion as she believed students of only some majors in her school were trained and had good IT skills and had to do some of their projects on computers. But other majors were not trained.

Overall, I agree that most students with the exclusion of some majors, in public schools do not have any training at all and this makes the integration of ICT a much more difficult job as teachers have to both teach the IT skills and also their related subject matter which considering time limititation and other problems is not feasible.

 

4.2.4 Language

Most interviewees referred to their competence in English as a factor encouraging and helping them to use computer at home or school. Leila puts it in this way

“My qualification in English has helped me overcome many language problems relating to reading the instructions while downloading, installing… I know lots of IT advisors who are teachers of other subjects are not good at these things because of language problem”.

This finding pinpoints the paramount importance of English in facilitating the integration of computers in teaching thus emphasizing the need for some language classes for teachers of other subjects and also counting on English teachers as the pioneers in the process of integration of technology.

 

4.2.5 Human resources

a) Head teacher support

Almost all interviewees reported the head teacher’s lack of support as another important factor discouraging them from ICT use. Studies by Cox (1999), Selwyn (1997), Hammond (2006) , Barton et al (2006) and Eifler et al, 2001; Wepner, et al, 2003 (in Kay, 2007) all indicated that support from the school staff had a significant impact on ICT integration by the teachers . Mukama and Andersson (2008 in Mukama, 2009) also state that access to ICT is also influenced by the style of leadership in each school as some head teachers limit the access to the computer rooms.

The interviewees mentioned that head teachers not only do not encourage them to use the IT room but also lock the room and in some cases when teachers ask for the key or educational CDs they are reluctant to give them the key/CD and let them in. Mehri said once for the first time she decided to take her students to the computer room and show them an educational CD that she had heard had been provided by the education department for English teachers to use:

” I asked the head teacher for it, after a long search… at last she said she didn’t know where it was”.

The main reason for this lack of support from the part of head teacher according to my personal experience and findings from Zamani’s (2009) study is the fear of breaking down the computers and the consequence of paying for the repair expenses as the head teacher should pay this from the annual school budget which is not enough for running the school.

b) Technical support

Not having an IT technician or an expert to support them while facing a technical problem was also a problem as some schools do not have a technical support or even if they have he/she is not an expert in computers and usually is a teacher of other subjects who has been announced extra in his/her major (as the teachers in Iran mostly have a full contract of teaching until they retire, they need to take another position in administrative section or as IT technicians to fill their compulsory teaching/working hours). Leila, one of the interviewees who now works as an IT advisor, is an example of such positioning. This finding matches the findings of studies by Jedeskog, 1988, Ferndaha2002 (in Ma et al, 2005) and Bullock (2004) in which lack of technical support and teachers’ fear of facing technical problems were reported as factors discouraging teachers from ICT use.

 

4.2.6 Physical resources

a) Hardware

The number of computers in each school was mentioned as between 15-20 in public schools as compared to 30 in non-profit schools which some reported as enough if the students were supposed to share the computers in public schools, therefore having 2-3 students behind each screen or each sat behind one in non-profit schools.

Some were saying that they needed to book the room in advance as there is just one room in each school and if their teaching time clashes with someone else’s class who is willing to use the computer room, then just one teacher would be able to take their students to the IT room. Booking the room in advance and planning the things in advance was mentioned as a problem teachers were facing in their effort to integrate ICT in their teaching (Barton et al, 2006).  Mona expresses her dissatisfaction with the facilities they have at school by saying: ”… I mean the computers are not well- equipped. There is no speakers, for example,. I remember once I wanted to play something for my students to listen to but there was no voice coming out of computers because of speaker problems”

I think hardware problems still exist and even if all other barriers are eradicated, lack of new and up to date computers and accessories and also not having enough computer rooms hinders teachers from employing ICT in their teaching.

b) Computer Networking

Some mentioned that computers were not networked and if they wanted to show students a film or listen to educational CDs they couldn’t because there was always something wrong with the computers e. g problems with networking. This is also something that can be alleviated if the school has a technician who is expert in computers not in other subjects as mentioned by some of the interviewees in the previous parts.

Mehri mentioned that some of the keyboards are in Farsi that makes it hard for them to type in English as they can’t remember the right place of each English letter.

c) Software

Most of the interviewees were complaining about not having enough software or CDs/DVDs to use in their classes which are consistent with the findings of studies by Hammond (2006) and Bullock (2004). Mehri gave an example in this respect saying that once influenced by somebody’s talk in an in-service training she decided to take her students to computer room and play an educational CD that she had heard the educational department had sent to all schools. She said:

“I asked the head teacher for it. She said she didn’t know where she had put it, after a long search at last she came empty handed saying she didn’t know where it was.”

d) Internet connection

Five out of six interviewees had access to Internet at school/home. However, their major concern was the head teachers’ unwillingness to pay for high speed Internet due to low annual school budget. Some were saying they do this deliberately as they do not want teachers and students to use the computer room/ Internet at school because of fear of breaking down the computers and the need to pay for fixing them.

Leila expresses this problem as:

“Head teachers are afraid of letting students and teachers use the IT room, breaking them and then the cost of fixing them as the head teachers should pay from their annual budget which is not enough for running the school”

One of the respondents to the questionnaire explains his reason for not using Internet at home/school as:

“Because I have no access to ADSL (high speed Internet connection) it’s frustrating to use the dial-up Internet system.”

e) Access to some websites

All the interviewees mentioned the unavailability of some websites in Iran. Interestingly, most of them considered this as a factor reassuring them about the suitability of the available sites lowering their concern about the Internet use at school. They expressed the need for some control at school on students while using Internet if there is any use, of course. Ali is a Facebook user himself despite its being blocked. Ali’s answer to my question about the unavailability of some websites was:

” some sites are blocked and actually this is fine but there are some websites that can be used in both positive and negative ways… it all depends on the user and unavailability of those sites make things difficult for good users. We often use proxy software but sometimes it is caught and blocked itself and we have to wait for a new one to be found”

Tina 34 who has spent about five years in Australia and as she says she used to be a constant user of Facebook to keep in touch with her friends expresses her satisfaction with the blockage of some websites such as Twitter, Facebook and You tube and says:

“In this way the chances that students face inappropriate sites is less. After all it’s true that some web materials are against our culture and values but it doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t use Internet. We should be aware of these things and raise awareness of them in our students by telling them that they should avoid them”.

 

4.2.7 Resistance to change

Some interviewees mentioned teachers’ resistance to change or sticking to old methods of teaching as another barrier to integration of ICT in schools which is consistent with the results of studies by (Sim & Priestley, 2005; Andersson, 2006 in Mukama, 2009) in which it was indicated that some teachers especially old ones are resistant to change and have difficulty in changing their school routine. Leila, the IT advisor, who is self-trained, defined this fear as fear of technology by saying that:

“Teachers are scared of technology. They do not find their training enough to use computers.

Maybe more computer training makes them overcome this fear to some extent”

Ali refers to teachers’ inflexibility in changing their old methods of teaching either because of their workload and not having enough time to read and keep themselves up to date or because of their low confidence in their ability to adapt to a new method.

Tina puts this resistance in this way:

“the thing is that in our culture using computer for autonomous learning is not appreciated. On one hand people think the only way to learn is to go to formal classes and have a teacher, on the other hand, they don’t take computer seriously, especially, students who think it is just for playing games.”

 

4.2.8 Role model

Having a role model who uses ICT in her/his teaching or gives talk about the benefits of it was mentioned as a factor that would encourage teachers to integrate ICT in their teaching. This is in line with finding of studies by Bullock (2004) and Barton et al (2006). Considering role models, if no one is able to show the teachers how to collect resources and how to exploit them in their classes, then the novice teachers will experience pressure and burden (Barton et al, 2006). The idea of role model was a key issue emerged in the discussions with the participants in Barton’s study.

Mehri gave an example of how she was influenced by somebody who gave a talk in an in-service training session by saying:

“ I remember once we had an in-service meeting where somebody had come… I think he was a physics teacher and he was talking about the benefits of using computers in teaching and giving some examples of how his students had improved since he had started using ICT in his teaching.”Mehri further went on and said:” I was so impressed that I decided to take my students to the IT room and at least show them some DVD or educational CD the next day…” Feeling the need to catch up with others or keep up to date was mentioned as a factor encouraging teachers to use computers.

Ali expressed this need when he was doing his masters in TEFL and he found others better than himself in IT skills. He also referred to his need to find articles for his research as another factor driving him forward in learning how to use computer and later on how to use it his teaching to a limited extent.

 

4.2.9 Content of the Books

Content of books was mentioned as not appropriate for ICT integration as they were encouraging teacher talk and teacher centeredness as opposed to what is needed for a more ICT based classroom. This finding is an indication of teachers’ awareness of suitability of computers for a more learner -centred class. However, I think, they are not aware of how to adapt the content of the books or their teaching methods to a more learner- centred approach to teaching.

4.2.10 Attitudes

As the words used by the interviewees and some of the respondents to the open-ended questions of the questionnaire implied all of them had a positive attitude toward ICT and its integration in teaching. However, this positive attitude did not lead to more incorporation of technology in their classes which is supported by Smeet’s (2005) view that teachers may avoid integrating technology in their classes, for many reasons, in spite of perceiving the benefits of it in enhancing the quality of education. This is in contrast with Croxall and Cumming’s in Jerkins et al’ s (2009) findings that the food and consumer science teachers’attitude about computer use was positive and this affected their ICT use in their classes. The interviewees had also some concerns which indicated their cautiousness in this respect.

Mona expresses her positive attitude in this way:

“The ease of use of Internet for finding all sorts of information is great. It doesn’t limit you to specific time and space, for example you don’t need to go out to the library to get a book and find an article or something you can do so from the comfort of your house”.

In spite of her positive comments she was also concerned about the existence of some inappropriate sites and the danger of getting addicted to using some websites that may have more destructive effect on us than constructive impact. Therefore the cautiousness in Iranian context was different from Barton et al’ s study (2006) in which teachers had some reservations about the incidental use of computers as they suggested the need for planning in advance and booking the room.

A male respondent to the questionnaire provides this comment:

“Internet is like a blade with both sharp and blunt edges. It can be useful and harmful at the same time for our students because they don’t know how to use it”.

It is worth mentioning that all the interviewees suggested the need for having some control on students and the way they use the computer/Internet as a way to get round the problem of facing inappropriate sites. Most of them mentioned the need for raising awareness in students by teachers and parents and some of them stated that the way the students are brought up at home can determine their behaviour at school regarding Internet use.

To sum up, the results of the second phase of this study, that is the interview, revealed that in addition to fear of breaking computers and the subsequent cost of repairing, lack of relevant software, inadequate IT knowledge and competence of teachers, and limited support from the head-teachers and language ability identified in Zamani’s study in an Iranian context, there are many other factors hindering teachers from ICT use. These include class time, work load, hardware problems, Internet connection, unavailability of some websites, teachers’ resistance to change, not having a role model, and content of the books. These hindering factors all contribute to the limited use of computers /Internet in schools as well as home meaning that teachers only use some common applications with very low frequency with the highest frequency in terms of percentage being 25% of weekly writing on computers at home and at school.

 

  1. Applications and Implications

6. 1 Implication for the Iranian Education Department

Teachers will be more able to fully integrate more technology into their classrooms when the barriers are addressed through a top-down process.

According to Warschauer’s ICT Access model, “ICT use is a social practice involving access to physical artefacts, content, skills, and social support” (2003, p, 46). Physical resource includes access to computer and Internet connection. Digital resource is the digital material, that is text, video, audio,…) that is put up in www. Human resources concern the literacy/skills required for using computer/ Internet and social resources refer to community, institutional, organizational and societal structures supporting ICT use.

“ on the one hand, each resource is a contributor (originally Italic) to the effective use of ICTs. In other words, the presence of the resources helps ensure that ICT can be well used and exploited. On the other hand, by using ICTs well, we can help extend and promote these resources. If handed well, these resources can thus serve as a virtual circle that promotes social development and inclusion” (Warschauer, 2003, p, 46).

Therefore, according to the findings of this study regarding factors affecting ICT use by teachers and the importance of each of these contributors it is the responsibility of those in charge to set the grounds and provide the required facilities for teachers to help them integrate ICT in their teaching.

 

6. 2 Implication for school administrative staff

As the results of this study and many of the other studies conducted in this area has indicated head teacher and school staff support is among the main factors contributing to ICT use by teachers. As mentioned above, Warschauer (2003) also referred to human support as one of the contributors to the effective use of computers. Thus, school staff, especially, the head teachers should provide teachers with their ongoing support regarding ICT use and encourage teachers to embark on the process of ICT integration in teaching.

6. 3 Implications for senior teachers

Senior teachers in educational districts of each city in Iran are responsible for arranging meetings and inviting people expert in the field to give speeches and present their achievements or findings of the related studies conducted. Therefore, it would be a good idea if they arrange for speeches or demonstrations by some teachers who have experience in teaching with ICT (role models) to make other teachers aware of the benefits of ICT in enhancing teaching and learning and encourage them to use it in their teaching as much as possible.

6.4 Implications for the wider context of education 

As education is seen as a vital input to addressing many issues of a nation, a plethora of education related demands at all levels are also observed. However, given limited education budgets and investments, the demands put intolerable pressure on many countries’ educational systems including teachers and students. Although ICTs offer great opportunities for providing access to education and enhancing teaching and learning, the findings of many ICT related studies highlights the inadequacy of such investments that needs to be addressed in deeper levels.

7. Conclusion

The goal of the second phase of this study was to gain more insight into the factors affecting integration of computers in schools by the teachers. This included conducting a semi- structured interview over Skype/phone with six teachers from both school ICT users and nonusers. Based on the findings of the qualitative part of the study, there are many factors that affect teachers’ ICT integration at school which include class time, workload, training, language, having a role model, physical resources, human resources, teachers’ resistance to change and their attitudes toward ICT and its benefits.

 

Acknowledgement: I would like to express my deep gratitude to Dr James Simpson, my supervisor at the university of Leed, Uk, for his sincere and unfailing support all the way long through conducting this study.

 

References

Ashtarian, S. 2012. Patterns of ICT Use by Iranian EFL Teachers at Home/School.  Iranian EFL Journal, 8, 181-192.

Albirini,A. 2006. Teachers’ attitudes toward information and communication  technologies: the case of Syrian EFL teachers. Computers & Education, 47, 373-398.

Barton, R., Haydon, T. 2006. Trainee teachers’ views on what helps them to use   information and communication technology effectively in their subject teaching.  Journal of computer assisted learning, 22, 257-272.

Bullock, D. 2004. Moving from theory to Practice: An Examination of the Factors that  Pre-service Teachers Encounter as the Attempt to gain Experience Teaching  with Technology during Field Placement Experiences. Journal of Technology  and Teacher Education, 12(2), 211-237.

Cox, M., Preston, Ch., Cox, K. 1999.http://www.scribd.com/doc/11003453/What-  Factors Support-or-Prevent-Teachers-From-Using-ICT-in-Their-Classrooms  (last  retrieved on Nov 2009).

Farhady, H., Sajadi Hezaveh, F., & Hedayati, H. (2010). Reflections on Foreign  Language Education in Iran. TESL- EJ. 13(4), 1-18.

Fisher, C., Dwyer, D. C., & Yocam, K. (Eds.). (1996). Education and TechnologyReflections on Computing in Classrooms. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Hammond, M ., Fragkouli, E ., Suandi, I ., Crosson, S ., Ingram, J., Johnston- Wilder, P  ., Johnston-Wilder, S. , Kingston, Y ., Pope, M., & Wray, D. 2009. ‘What happens as student teachers who made very good use of ICT during pre- service training enter their first year of teaching?’, Teacher Development,  13(2), 93 – 106.

Heemskerk, I., Brink, A., Volman, M., Dam, G. 2005. Inclusiveness and ICT in education: a focus on gender, ethnicity and social class. Journal of computer   Assisted learning. 21, 1-16.

Jenkins, D., Mimbs, A., Kitchel, T. 2009. Computer literacy, access and use of      technology      in the family and consumer science classroom. Journal of family and Consumer Sciences Education, 27(1), 1-13.

Kay, R. 2007. A formative analysis of how pre-service teachers learn to use   technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Language Learning. 23, 366-383. Ma, W, W., Andersson, R., Streith, K. 2005. Examining user acceptance of computer technology: an empirical study of student teachers. Journal of computer Assisted  Language learning. 21,387-395.

Mukama, E. 2009. The interplay between learning and the use of ICT in Rwandan  student teachers’ everyday practice. Journal of Computer Assisted Language  Learning. 25, 539-548.

Smeets, E. 2005. Does ICT contribute to powerful learning environments in primary  education? Computers and Education, 44, 343-355.

Shahamat, F., Riazi, A. 2009. The place of Information and CommunicatioTechnology  in Second language Teaching in Girl’s Highschools and Private English Institutes in Shiraz. Iranian EFL Journal, 4, 71-93.

Zamani, B.E. 2010. Successful implementation factors for using computers in Iranian  schools during one decade (1995-2005). Computers &Education, 54,59-68.

Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital  Divide.The MIT Press.Cambridge, Massachussetts.london, England.

 

Appendix A: Interview Schedule

General Information

Could you tell me about yourself and your teaching experience (experience, degree, IT training, access to computer/Internet at home/school …)

Computer use at home

Tell me about your computer use at home. What are the things you do on your computer at home? (word processing, excel, power point, Internet,…)

Computer use at school

Tell me about your computer use at school. What are the things you do on your computer at school? (word processing, excel, power point, Internet,…)

Factors encouraging/hindering computer use at home

What are the factors that encourage/discourage you to use computer at home? (access to hardware/software, time, training, support from others…)

Factors encouraging/hindering computer use at school

What are the factors that encourage/discourage you to use computer at school? (access to hardware/software, time, training, human resources including technical support or support from head teachers…)

Attitudes toward using computer/Internet

What do you think about using computer/Internet in general? What are the advantages/ disadvantages of using them? ( motivation, cultural appropriateness, cost, complications, …)

Leave a Reply