The project is about Prof Goh, a certain philosophy professor who forces his students to pay subscription fee to his blog post. The blog post is essential to students as it contains essential for their exam. The students try to argue with the prof using philosophical concepts to dissuade him from forcing them to pay for the blog subscription.
W05-Z-03
An inter-university philosophy competition is approaching, and Prof Loy is looking for capable students to represent the Philosophy Department. After learning that his students have passed his most difficult quiz, he is optimistic of their performance in the competition. However, his TAs make a major revelation. Watch how Prof Loy, a deontologist, reacts and how his TAs use hedonic utilitarianism to defend their students!
W13-J-03
In his new YouTube series, Philosophy 101, Professor Ashique applies complex philosophical concepts to real life.
W07-R-01
Our brief topical interpretation of GET1029 in the form of memes. (Click on the graphic to see all the memes.)
W14-R-01
You’re an ordinary student living a normal life, but then you come across the concepts of posthumanity and ancestor simulations in GET1029… and your life can never be the same again. This interactive text adventure game explores all the possibilities of Bostrom’s simulation argument. (Click on the graphic to play the game.)
W18-G-04
Dave and Lena create a robot to do their GET quiz for them. However, a misstep results in a tragic consequence and a discussion of moral responsibility and free will.
W07-R-05
Our project illustrates a social media post with a short story encapsulating a similar concept as the drowning child argument, followed by comments which brings up philosophical objections. (Click on the graphic to see the whole story.)
W16-J-04
Ever thought if you should be eating meat or not? This quiz was designed for the average meat eater who has not thought about the ethics of eating meat and is curious to see if their ethical leanings match their actions. (Click on the graphic to start the quiz.)
W11-J-01
This 6-panel meme presents Zhuangzi’s argument with regards to interminable disputations and the epistemic permissivist response in the form of a bird meme
(with a twist at the end). (Click on graphic to see the whole thing.)
W12-M-05