Deliberate act of killing VS letting patient die. Is there a moral difference between active and passive euthanasia? How do we approach this issue from the deontological and utilitarianism’s perspective? In our poster, we shall consider medical ethics from a philosophical viewpoint.
W7G3
The infographic presents an outline of an argument that supports the consumption of meat using Kantian Deontology. The target audience is NUS students.
W7G1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNqjgiOqF94
What will happen if Singer’s drowning child is replaced by an adult? Will it be as effective in pinning moral responsibility on the individual witnessing the scene?
We hope our project would be engaging and accessible to the general public, even those without a background in philosophy.
Group members and contributions:
W5G1
Following the utilitarian approach, what matters is the overall net happiness of the world in the present and future. We will be comparing happiness generated from using renewable and non-renewable energy. Our stand will be to encourage young adults to use renewable energy to maximise happiness.
W10G5
We intend to appeal to meat lovers, questioning the difference between the factory-farmed animals we consume and the pets we keep. Furthermore, we want them to consider if such differences in treatment are justified. Why do we value some animals while subjecting others, even from the same species, to suffering?
W10G3
How would we choose when met with ethical dilemmas? This poster introduces a simple ethical problem to the layman, to kill five or one. The choice we make actually reflects our moral intuition, which can be explained by either of the three moral principles – Utilitarianism, Deontology or Virtue Ethics.
W10G1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-kExsP3iSs&feature=youtu.be
This is a stop-motion video on the arguments for eating factory farmed meat. It is communicated through a made-up conversation between Lomasky and Norcross. The video aims to argue against the premise that torturing puppies (in Norcross’s argument) is analogous to eating factory farmed meat.
W9G2
This is a poster with Haikus and Comics depicting how the 3 different schools of thought – Deontology, Virtue Ethics, and Consequentialism – apply to everyday situations. Anybody interested in Philosophy will be able to understand their distinctions and applications.
W8G4
We intend to do a poster about Problem of Evil, showing two sides of the argument. In order to make it so that people who didn’t study Philosophy will be able to understand it, we will use simple terms and analogies in our poster
W8G1
A script set in a typical Hollywood survival movie scenario here some isolated individuals have run out of food and are forced into the age old dilemma of whether or not to kill and eat dying companions for their own survival.
W8G2
https://youtu.be/KiNkLn6pmPM
Our video (aiming to entertain for a lay audience) begins with a skit depicting three pregnant mothers contemplating abortion after learning that their babies are deformed. Each mother represents one of three philosophical doctrines: Utilitarianism, Deontology and Virtue-Ethics. Their choices are explained in a parody of the popular PPAP song.
W8G3
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATWazeWC_Yg
Boy meets Girl. She was his Goddess. Let’s see if love prevails in the Cosmological Argument.
W6G6
An outline of the Regress Argument for Skepticism. To comprehensively introduce the regress problem to beginners in Philosophy.
W6G5
https://youtu.be/bh-Poke9n3Q
We aim to introduce normal folk to the concept of philosophy. This video shows you how philosophy completely messes up a promising student’s mind. Be thoroughly entertained as you watch a simple conversation between two friends, leading to a chain of rapid philosophical questioning before reaching an EPIC conclusion.
W6G2
What’s right or wrong depends on one’s perspective. Using a bit of humour, this informational video attempts to inform the audience about the challenges of right vs. wrong by following Alan’s decision-making process on whether or not to pick up rubbish using deontology, consequentialism and virtue ethics.
W6G1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2CMtbtlcjTs
This is a short video talking about the Justified True Belief model within epistemology. We thought it will be a good bridge between what we did for scepticism and knowledge.
W5G7
This project discusses the notion of moral responsibility through a case scenario. The story is visually aided by Simpsons characters to increase appeal and relevance to the young target audience. Ultimately, we hope to demonstrate the complexity of attributing moral responsibility, concluding in there being potentially no full moral responsibility.
W5G5
The aim of our project is to educate and intrigue fellow NUS students about philosophical arguments on the moral acceptability of eating factory-farmed meat. This is done by highlighting two interesting points of view: Norcross’ puppy argument and Lomasky’s objection regarding Norcross’ argument.
W5G4
A series of comics that encompasses the first eight topics of the module by highlighting certain aspects of every chapter through illustration and the actions of the characters, often involving death and the metaphysical. The purpose of this project serves to tackle the breadth of the module itself.
W5G3
This project aims to target laymen and introduce the arguments made by Leibniz/Clarke, and its links to the theme of the Principle of Sufficient Reasoning. To reduce complexities, we have excluded the objections that were introduced. We endeavor to cause readers to wonder at the possibility of a self-existent being.
W5G2
https://youtu.be/OIg5BiQKI1U
This video project serves as an illustration to the attempts at solving the Problem of Evil posed by J. L.
Mackie (1917-1981), with hints of humor. It is meant to be targeted at fellow NUS students.
W4G5
