Category: cholinergics (page 1 of 2)

Why are peripheral effects of AChE inhibitors predominantly parasympathomimetic?

Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors will prevent the breakdown of acetylcholine (ACh) and so increase ACh levels. Increased ACh levels at autonomic nervous system ganglia should activate both the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems. However, the adverse effects of AChE inhibitors outside of the CNS are mostly parasympathomimetic. Why do AChE inhibitors not stimulate the sympathetic nervous system as well?

Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors increase the concentration of acetylcholine (ACh) at synapses by blocking its breakdown. This will activate both the sympathetic and parasympathetic systems, as the preganglionic neurons in both systems release ACh.

However, the impact of AChE inhibitors is more prominent on the parasympathetic nervous system for several reasons:
Continue reading

When sympathetic and parasympathetic systems collide: The dominance of excitatory effects

When the autonomic nervous system ganglia are activated (for example, by low-dose nicotine), both the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system innervations of target organs and tissues are simultaneously stimulated. However, the “fright, fight or flight” sympathetic and “rest and digest” parasympathetic nervous systems have opposing effects in most target organs and tissues. So why do the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems not just cancel each other out when activated at the same time?

It is true that in the realm of autonomic nervous system functioning, the sympathetic and parasympathetic systems often represent two sides of the same coin. These systems largely produce opposing effects on the same target organs and tissues. However, what happens when both systems are simultaneously activated? Contrary to intuitive thinking, they don’t simply cancel each other out. Instead, the dominion of activation or excitatory effects takes centre stage.

The Principle of Dominant Excitation: When both the sympathetic and parasympathetic systems are co-activated, it isn’t a zero-sum game. Rather than neutralizing each other, the excitatory effects from each system generally prevail. This principle is observed in a variety of physiological contexts. Continue reading

Ganglionic blockers versus depolarising NMBAs

High-dose nicotine induces depolarising blockade and subsequent secondary non-depolarising blockade at autonomic ganglia. Meanwhile, depolarising NMBAs induce depolarising block consisting of Phase I and Phase II. Is it the same thing?

Yes, they are essentially the same mechanisms as far as the nicotinic receptors go. It is primarily a difference in terminology. Although secondary non-depolarising block is a more scientifically descriptive term than Phase II, the depolarising NMBAs are already called “depolarising” to contrast with the non-depolarising NMBAs (direct nicotinic receptor antagonists). It would therefore be confusing to say that depolarising NMBAs have a secondary non-depolarising block. Hence, the common usage of the Phase I and Phase II terminology.

Depolarising versus non-depolarising NMBAs

What is the difference between a depolarising and a non-depolarising NMBA? Do both result in flaccid paralysis?

Depolarising neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are potent agonists at nicotinic receptors that cause depolarising block (and necessarily also the secondary desensitising/non-depolarising block). In contrast, non-depolarising NMBAs are direct competitive nicotinic receptor antagonists.

An important difference is that non-depolarising NMBAs can be reversed by increasing acetylcholine (ACh) levels by using an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor such as neostigmine. Depolarising NMBAs cannot be reversed in the same way since increasing ACh availability just causes more depolarizing block (and inevitably secondary desensitising/non-depolarising block).

As depolarising NMBAs initially cause activation, they will cause twitching/fasciculation followed by rigid paralysis on onset (although this phase is over quickly) before switching to flaccid paralysis. In contrast, non-depolarising NMBAs will go straight to progressive flaccid paralysis.

Neostigmine versus pyridostigmine

What is the preferred oral acetylcholinesterase inhibitor for myasthenia gravis?

Pyridostigmine is often preferred to neostigmine for myasthenia gravis for three reasons:

(1) The onset of the effect of oral pyridostigmine (approximately 45 minutes) is faster than that for neostigmine (approximately 4 hours). The speedier onset allows for more precise adjustment of the dosing schedule around daily living activities to ensure as much muscle function as possible when required.

(2) The half-life of pyridostigmine (approximately 90 to 110 minutes) is longer than that for neostigmine (approximately 50 to 90 minutes). The difference is not great, but when the patient has to take the drug multiple times in a day, it is an advantage that 3 or 4 times per day is often sufficient with pyridostigmine.

(2) Pyridostigmine is about four times less potent than neostigmine. That is right, being less potent is an advantage because it is easier to titrate the dose to a level that controls the motor symptoms without causing too many adverse effects. This is especially important in the early stages of the disease when the motor symptoms are less pronounced.

Does nicotine cause sweating?

The eccrine sweat glands express muscarinic M3 cholinergic receptors. In an exception to the usual rule that the postganglionic neurotransmitter for the sympathetic nervous system is noradrenaline or adrenaline, the sympathetic nervous system innervates the eccrine sweat glands with cholinergic nerve fibres.  Thus, sweating associated with the fight-or-flight response is a sympathetic nervous system response mediated by cholinergic activation of M3 receptors.

But does nicotine not also cause sweating? Nicotine can contribute to sweating in a number of ways. The preganglionic nerve fibres of both the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system are cholinergic release acetylcholine to activate nicotinic cholinergic receptors on the ganglionic neurones. Thus nicotine can directly activate the ganglionic neurones triggering activation of the cholinergic postganglionic sympathetic nervous system innervation of the eccrine sweat glands.

The nerve terminals innervating the sweat glands also have presynaptic nicotinic receptors. Application of acetylcholine or nicotine to the skin will activate these nerve terminals triggering action potentials to branches of the nerve innervating adjacent sweat glands to release acetylcholine and activate postsynaptic M3 receptors on these sweat glands.  This is referred to as the sudomotor axon reflex.

sudomotorImage credit: http://www.medicavisie.eu/de/technologien/#sudomotor

Note that to acheive activation of nicotinic receptors exposure to nicotine has to be at a low dose and for a short duration. High doses of nicotine or prolonged exposure to nicotine can lead to depolarising and desensitising block of nicotinic receptor neurotransmission.

How long is the window before ageing of acetylcholinesterase after organophosphate poisoning?

Organophosphates essentially irreversibly inhibit acetylcholinesterase by leaving a phosphate group bound to the enzyme. Oximes, such as pralidoxime, reversibly bind to acetylcholinesterase and have high affinity for binding to phosphate groups. They can, therefore, bind to acetylcholinesterase, pick up the phosphate group inhibiting the acetylcholinesterase, and take the phosphate group with them when they leave the acetylcholinesterase. Thus pralidoxime can be used to regenerate acetylcholinesterase after organophosphate poisoning.

A limitation of pralidoxime is that it is only effective in a limited time window before ageing of the organophosphate inhibition of acetylcholinesterase occurs. Pralidoxime itself binds to and competitively inhibits acetylcholinesterase. Therefore, if pralidoxime is administered after all the organophosphate-inhibited acetylcholinesterase has already aged, pralidoxime will just make the anticholinesterase poisoning worse. It is therefore important to administer pralidoxime in the appropriate time window.

Continue reading

How can I remember the adverse effects of over-activation of the parasympathetic nervous system?

The adverse effects of over-activation of the parasympathetic nervous system, for example by poisoning with an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, can be remembered by the following mnemonic, SLUDGE/BBB:

Salivation
Lacrimation
Urination or urinary incontinence
Defecation or diarrhoea
Gastrointestinal distress
Emesis
/
Bradycardia
Bronchoconstriction
Bronchorrhoea

Alternatively, you can use the mnemonic, DUMBELS:

Defecation or diarrhoea
Urination or urinary incontinence
Miosis
Bradycardia / Bronchoconstriction / Bronchorrhoea
Emesis
Lacrimation
Salivation

Why does it matter that neostigmine is resistant to hydration or hydrolysis?

Why do we say that neostigmine inhibition of acetylcholinesterase is resistant to hydration or hydrolysis? Why do some textbooks say resistant to hydration, while others say resistant to hydrolysis? Are hydration and hydrolysis the same thing? 

Neostigmine is an example of a carbamate anticholinesterase.  It inhibits the breakdown of acetylcholine by acetylcholinesterase and so increases the availability of synaptic acetylcholine wherever it is release.  Clinically it is used to reverse non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockade (e.g. coming out of surgical anaesthesia) and in the treatment of myasthenia gravis.  It is also sometimes used to increase gastrointestinal motility on postoperative or neurogenic ileus and in the treatment of urinary retention secondary to bladder atony.

Acetylcholinesterase works by rapidly hydrolyzing acetylcholine (which is an ester of acetic acid and choline) to acetic acid and choline. Carbamate esters competitively inhibit acetylcholinesterase by occupying the active site on the enzyme and taking much longer to be hydrolyzed.  They work by forming a carbamoylated acetylcholinesterase-drug complex that is resistant to hydration and hence is resistant to hydrolysis.

Hydration and hydrolysis are not the same thing. Hydration is the addition of water (H2O) whereas hydrolysis is the breaking of a bond by reaction with water. However, in the case of the carbamoyl group attached to acetylcholinesterase the hydrolysis is a two-step process: first requiring hydration (addition of the water) before hydrolysis (breaking of the bond between the carbamoyl group and the acetylcholinesterase). Hence, for the carbamate anticholinesterase inhibition of acetylcholinesterase, the resistance to hydrolysis is a consequence of resistance to hydration.

What does “nonselective” muscarinic receptor antagonist mean?

In the context of autonomic system pharmacology, you will often come across drugs described as “nonselective muscarinic antagonists” or “nonselective alpha-adrenoceptor antagonists”. What does “nonselective” mean in this context?

The potential confusion here is that you might think that a “nonselective muscarinic antagonist” is a drug that is not selective for muscarinic receptors and so also acts on other types of receptors (for example, adrenoceptors) at therapeutic doses.  This is not what is meant when these phrases are used in the context of autonomic nervous system pharmacology.

There are many subtypes of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors: M1, M2, M3, M4 and M5 receptors. However, most of the muscarinic cholinergic and anticholinergic drugs in current clinical use are nonselective between the muscarinic receptors subtypes. These drugs are selective for muscarinic receptors over other types of receptor, such as nicotinic acetylcholine receptors or adrenoceptors, but are nonselective between the muscarinic receptor subtypes (M1, M2, M3, M4 and M5 receptors). For example, atropine is a nonselective muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist because it blocks all muscarinic receptor subtypes: M1, M2, M3, M4 and M5 receptors.  But atropine is selective for muscarinic acetylcholine receptors over other classes of receptor, such as nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.

Likewise, there are many subtypes of adrenoceptors: α1A-, α1B-, α1D-, α2A-, α2B-, α2C-, β1-, β2– and β3-adrenoceptors. Many of the adrenergic and antiadrenergic drugs in current clinical use target alpha- or beta-adrenoceptors but are nonselective between the subtypes of alpha or beta receptors. For example, oxymetazoline is selective for alpha-adrenoceptors over beta-adrenoceptors but may be described as a nonselective alpha-adrenoceptor agonist because it is largely nonselective between α1A-, α1B-, α1D-, α2A-, α2B– and α2C-adrenoceptors.

Older posts

© 2024 PharmaNUS

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑

Skip to toolbar