Month: May 2021 (page 2 of 2)

Mechanism of action of lubiprostone

What is the exact mechanism of action of lubiprostone in increasing intestinal motility?

Lubiprostone is a bicyclic fatty acid derived from a metabolite of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1). It is used primarily to treat chronic idiopathic constipation in adults and constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome in women. Lubiprostone acts via chloride channels to increase chloride levels in the lumen of the bowel. Water osmotically follows the chloride. The increase in fluid both softens the bowel contents and increases the bulk of the bowel contents stimulating peristalsis.

The peristaltic reflex triggers the peristalsis. The bulk of the bolus in the lumen of the gut mechanically stimulates enterochromaffin (EC) cells to release 5-HT, which activates intrinsic primary afferent neurons (IPANs). The IPANs, in turn activate the myenteric plexus to engage retrograde and anterograde cholinergic pathways. The retrograde pathway releases substance P and acetylcholine to contract the smooth muscle behind the bolus. The anterograde pathway releases nitric oxide and vasoactive intestinal peptide to relax the smooth muscle in front of the bolus. This allows peristalsis to move the bolus forward along the intestinal tract.

However, there is some controversy in the scientific literature over the exact mechanism by which lubiprostone acts on chloride transport (for review, see Wilson and Schey, 2015). It was initially identified as an activator of type 2 chloride channels (ClC-2) on the apical surface of the intestinal epithelium stimulating chloride-rich secretions. However, it has also been shown that lubiprostone likely activates prostaglandin E2 receptor 4 (EP4) to activate the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), another major epithelial cell membrane chloride channel. Yet, lubiprostone still appears to be effective in treating constipation in patients with cystic fibrosis, suggesting that other mechanisms are also important. Meanwhile, other evidence emerged that ClC-2 is localised on the basolateral membranes of the jejunal and colonic epithelium and is involved primarily in absorption rather than secretion of chloride. It has been reported that lubiprostone leads to internalisation of basolateral ClC-2 with concomitant trafficking of CFTR and the chloride/ hydrogen carbonate exchanger PAT-1 to the apical membrane. Thus, lubiprostone may result in reduced absorption of chloride via ClC-2 on the basolateral membranes at the same time as increased secretion of chloride via CFTR and PAT-1 on the apical membranes.

Although the exact mechanisms of the effect on chloride remain incompletely understood, it is clear that lubiprostone increases chloride in the lumen of the bowel.

Reference:

Wilson, N. and Schey, R. (2015) Ther Adv Chronic Dis. Mar; 6(2): 40–50.

NSAIDs increase risk of gastritis and gastric ulcers

What is the mechanism for NSAIDs leading to gastric ulcer formation? Can it also cause gastritis?

With high levels of acidity and digestive enzymes, and food movement, the stomach is an aggressive environment for the tissues lining the stomach wall. Prostaglandins mediate endogenous protective mechanisms, including (1) increased mucosal blood flow; (2) increased mucus secretion; (3) increased bicarbonate secretion; and, at high concentrations, (4) reduced acid secretion.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) inhibit the cyclo-oxygenase (COX) enzyme. COX is involved in the production of prostanoids, including classical prostaglandins. In the stomach, COX-1 is essential for the production of the protective prostaglandins. Therefore, inhibition of COX by NSAIDs increases the risk of gastritis (the general term for conditions involving inflammation of the lining of the stomach), including gastric ulcers.

Brimonidine for glaucoma

If brimonidine is an adrenergic agonist, how and why does it reduce glaucoma?

Brimonidine acts at postsynaptic alpha-2 adrenoreceptors on blood vessels to cause vasoconstriction, reducing aqueous humour production. Long-term, there are also effects on uveoscleral drainage, perhaps secondary to reduced blood flow to the ciliary muscle.

Brimonidine alone is not as potent at reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) as beta-blockers or prostaglandin F2alpha analogues (e.g., latanoprost). The primary reason that brimonidine has come back into use is that it also has a neuroprotective action, reducing the death of retinal ganglion cells through mechanisms that remain poorly understood.

Ganglionic blockers versus depolarising NMBAs

High-dose nicotine induces depolarising blockade and subsequent secondary non-depolarising blockade at autonomic ganglia. Meanwhile, depolarising NMBAs induce depolarising block consisting of Phase I and Phase II. Is it the same thing?

Yes, they are essentially the same mechanisms as far as the nicotinic receptors go. It is primarily a difference in terminology. Although secondary non-depolarising block is a more scientifically descriptive term than Phase II, the depolarising NMBAs are already called “depolarising” to contrast with the non-depolarising NMBAs (direct nicotinic receptor antagonists). It would therefore be confusing to say that depolarising NMBAs have a secondary non-depolarising block. Hence, the common usage of the Phase I and Phase II terminology.

Depolarising versus non-depolarising NMBAs

What is the difference between a depolarising and a non-depolarising NMBA? Do both result in flaccid paralysis?

Depolarising neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are potent agonists at nicotinic receptors that cause depolarising block (and necessarily also the secondary desensitising/non-depolarising block). In contrast, non-depolarising NMBAs are direct competitive nicotinic receptor antagonists.

An important difference is that non-depolarising NMBAs can be reversed by increasing acetylcholine (ACh) levels by using an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor such as neostigmine. Depolarising NMBAs cannot be reversed in the same way since increasing ACh availability just causes more depolarizing block (and inevitably secondary desensitising/non-depolarising block).

As depolarising NMBAs initially cause activation, they will cause twitching/fasciculation followed by rigid paralysis on onset (although this phase is over quickly) before switching to flaccid paralysis. In contrast, non-depolarising NMBAs will go straight to progressive flaccid paralysis.

How does ageing impact on drug dosing

Physiological changes associated with ageing can impact the appropriate dosing for many drugs. General principles to keep in mind include:

Absorption:

  • Absorption usually does not change with normal ageing.

Distribution:

  • Concentrations of water-soluble drugs are usually higher as there is less water and so a lower volume of distribution.
  • Concentrations of free or active (unbound) drug are usually higher due to lower serum proteins.

Metabolism:

  • The half-life of lipophilic drugs is usually higher due to more fat resulting in an increased volume of distribution and prolonged duration of action.
  • There is slower Phase I metabolism (e.g., oxidation, reduction and dealkylation) due to cytochrome P450 pathways resulting in higher levels of drugs dependent on these pathways for metabolism (e.g., warfarin).
  • However, Phase II reactions (e.g., conjugation, acetylation, and methylation) are usually unchanged in normal ageing.
  • There is a greater risk of drug-drug interactions in metabolism due to increased numbers of drugs for multiple medical problems.

Excretion:

  • Hepatic excretion may be impaired.
  • Renal clearance may be impaired, and serum creatinine may not be an accurate reflection of renal clearance in elderly patients due to decreased lean body mass (muscle mass).
  • Active drug metabolites can accumulate, resulting in prolonged therapeutic actions and a greater risk of adverse effects.

There is also increased susceptibility to adverse effects. Older adults are also more likely to have multiple chronic medical problems, and disease states can result in physiological changes:

  • Cardiac disease can result in impaired cardiac output resulting in impaired ADME and greater susceptibility to cardiac adverse effects.
  • Liver or kidney disease can decrease metabolism and excretion, reducing drug clearance.
  • Neurological diseases result in greater sensitivity to neurological adverse effects due to diminished neurotransmitter levels and/or impaired cerebral blood flow.

 

Allopurinol versus febuxostat

When would a patient diagnosed with hyperuricaemia who had been successfully managed with allopurinol be switched to febuxostat?

Allopurinol is a purine analogue and competitive inhibitor of xanthine oxidase, a key enzyme in the production of uric acid by purine metabolism. Thus, allopurinol can effectively reduce plasma urate levels in the management of hyperuricaemia and chronic gout. Febuxostat is a non-purine competitive inhibitor of xanthine oxidase recommended for people who cannot tolerate allopurinol.

Allopurinol is associated with increased risk of rare but potentially fatal serious cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR), such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS). Risk factors for allopurinol-induced SCAR include HLA-B5801 allele, starting dose of allopurinol, and renal impairment. The HLA-B5801 allele is more common among people of Asian ancestry, particularly the Han Chinese and Koreans. For example, in Singapore, the frequency of HLA-B*5801 prevalence is estimated at 18.5% (approximately 1 in 5 Singaporeans or 1 in 5 Chinese, 1 in 15 Malays, and 1 in 25 Indians).

Suppose a patient’s urate levels have responded well to allopurinol, but the patient has developed allopurinol-induced adverse effects, such as SCAR. In that case, switching to the other available xanthine oxidase inhibitor, febuxostat is a reasonable option.

https://www.hsa.gov.sg/announcements/safety-alert/allopurinol-induced-serious-cutaneous-adverse-reactions-and-the-role-of-genotyping

Newer posts

© 2024 PharmaNUS

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑

Viewing Message: 1 of 1.
Warning

Blog.nus accounts will move to SSO login, tentatively before the start of AY24/25 Sem 2. Once implemented, only current NUS staff and students will be able to log in to Blog.nus. Public blogs remain readable to non-logged in users. (More information.)

Skip to toolbar