To many of us, there is nothing more gratifying than watching our favourite athletes push their limits and fight for victory at the Olympic Games. After all, it is these magical moments that encapsulate what the Olympic Games is symbolic of — glory, national pride and resilience. Yet, it is also in these very moments of celebration that we forget about those who are negatively and disproportionately impacted by the Olympic Games. This is especially so for air pollution, where we frequently overlook how residents of host cities — especially the marginalised — are widely exposed to pollutants, causing long-term health and socio-economic problems.
Therein lies the issue of environmental injustice, where disadvantaged societal groups are forced to bear the “external costs of [economic] development” (Jerrett, 2009, p. 231). Such environmental injustice inherent to Olympic air pollution is most prominent at the city level, where socioeconomically vulnerable poor and minority communities inevitably face air pollution. Such exposure not only manifests from the construction of Olympic venues near marginalised communities, who lack the bargaining power to protest (Pulido, 2017), but also these communities’ reliance on public transport that increases their exposure to traffic emissions (Pratt et al., 2015).
Tokyo residents in protest against the 2020 Olympic Games, which they argue will worsen environmental inequalities for the city’s poor (Burack, 2021)
However, you might still be wondering why environmental injustice poses a big problem for marginalised residents of host cities, apart from making them more susceptible to chronic respiratory illnesses. Well, it is precisely this likelihood of falling ill that engenders further socio-economic issues, namely the sustained lack of network capital and concomitant worsening of marginalisation. When residents are unwell, this not only compromises their work productivity, but also their ability to seek employment opportunities. This deprives them of network capital, which Urry (2012, p. 27) defines as the “capacity to engender and sustain relations… which generate practical benefit”, causing residents to be unable to earn livelihoods. More worryingly, however, this establishes a positive feedback loop where impoverished residents slip deeper into marginalisation, making them increasingly vulnerable to discriminatory pollutive practices (Pulido, 2017).
Such phenomena have begun emerging in Los Angeles, which is currently preparing for the 2028 Olympic Games. On the surface, Los Angeles is the epitome of a model host city, being equipped with sufficient finances to construct grand stadiums while pledging to improve minority access to sports spaces. However, this regard for inclusivity does not prove true in reality, as marginalised communities are forced to deal with the air pollution being generated during construction. Since 2016, construction has commenced for three major sports facilities (Mahoney, 2021), with such construction taking place in the predominantly Black city of Inglewood. This has not only heightened the risk of Inglewood residents developing respiratory illnesses, with these residents facing more air pollution than 96% of California state (Mahoney, 2021), but also raised concerns of long-term pollutant exposure from increased traffic (Henry, 2019). The latter is especially ironic — while low-income Inglewood residents use public transport to travel to work, it is also this dependence on public transport that makes residents sick and threatens their sustenance of livelihoods.
The construction of SoFi Stadium in the black-dominated city of Inglewood has drawn criticism from residents, who experience significant air and noise pollution (Mahoney, 2021)
Hence, it is salient to recognise that while the Olympic Games might be a temporary highlight for host cities, its impacts can be permanent and far-reaching in scale. With that, stay tuned for the next post, which will investigate the environmental injustice of Olympic air pollution at the global scale!
References
Burack, E. (2021). The Olympics Devastate Host Cities and Need a Permanent Location [Online image]. Teen Vogue. https://www.teenvogue.com/story/olympics-host-cities-tokyo-los-angeles
Henry, J. (2019, December 27). Traffic, noise from new LA Clippers arena would be ‘significant’ and ‘unavoidable,’ report says. Daily Breeze. https://www.dailybreeze.com/2019/12/27/traffic-noise-from-new-la-clippers-arena-would-be-significant-and-unavoidable-report-says/
Jerrett, M. (2009). Global geographies of injustice in traffic-related air pollution exposure. Epidemiology, 20(2), 231-233. https://doi.org/10.1097/ede.0b013e31819776a1
Liu, L. (2013). Geographic approaches to resolving environmental problems in search of the path to sustainability: The case of polluting plant relocation in China. Applied Geography, 45, 138-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.08.011
Mahoney, A. (2021, October 12). The environmental justice fight to block the 2028 Olympics in Los Angeles. Grist. https://grist.org/cities/2028-olympics-los-angeles-environmental-justice-inglewood/
Pratt, G. C., Vadali, M. L., Kvale, D. L., & Ellickson, K. M. (2015). Traffic, air pollution, minority and socio-economic status: addressing inequities in exposure and risk. International journal of environmental research and public health, 12(5), 5355-5372. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120505355
Pulido, L. (2017). Rethinking environmental racism: White privilege and urban development in Southern California. In K. Anderson and B. Braun (Eds.), Environment (pp. 379-407). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315256351-17
Urry, J. (2012). Social networks, mobile lives and social inequalities. Journal of transport geography, 21, 24-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.10.003
Leave a comment