Suggested Readings on SoTL

Principles of SoTL 

  1. Shulman, L. S. (1999). Taking learning seriously. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning31(4), 10-17.
  2. Bass, R. (1999). The scholarship of teaching: What’s the problem. Inventio: Creative thinking about learning and teaching, 1(1), 1-10.
  3. Hutchings, P., & Shulman, L. S. (1999). The scholarship of teaching: New elaborations, new developments. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 31(5), 10-15.
  4. Richlin, L. (2001). Scholarly teaching and the scholarship of teaching. New directions for teaching and learning, 2001(86), 57-68.
  5. Kreber, C., & Cranton, P. A. (2000). Exploring the scholarship of teaching. Journal of Higher Education, 476-495.
  6. Trigwell, K., Martin, E., Benjamin, J., & Prosser, M. (2000). Scholarship of teaching: A model. Higher education research and development, 19(2), 155-168.
  7. Shulman, L. (2012). From Minsk to Pinsk: Why a scholarship of teaching and learning?. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 48-53.
  8. Kreber, C., & Kanuka, H. (2013). The scholarship of teaching and learning and the online classroom. Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education, 32(2).
  9. Kreber, C. (2015). Reviving the ancient virtues in the scholarship of teaching, with a slight critical twist. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(3), 568-580.
  10. Booth, S., & Woollacott, L. C. (2018). On the constitution of SoTL: its domains and contexts. Higher Education75(3), 537-551.
  11. Chick, N. L. (2018). SoTL in Action: Illuminating Critical Moments of Practice. Stylus Publishing.

SoTL as Professional Growth 

  1. Kahn, P., Goodhew, P., Murphy, M., & Walsh, L. (2013). The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning as collaborative working: a case study in shared practice and collective purpose. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(6), 901-914.
  2. Linder, K. E., Elek, E. D., & Calderon, L. (2014). SoTL and the Institutional Review Board: Considerations before Navigating the Application Process for Classroom Research in Higher Education. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning14(2), 1-14.
  3. Subbaye, R., & Dhunpath, R. (2016). Early-career academic support at the University of KwaZulu-Natal: towards a scholarship of teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 41(10), 1803-1819.
  4. Vithal, R. (2016). Growing a scholarship of teaching and learning institutionally. Studies in Higher Education, 1-16.
  5. Geertsema, J. (2016). Academic development, SoTL and educational research. International Journal for Academic Development21(2), 122-134.
  6. Myatt, P., Gannaway, D., Chia, I., Fraser, K., & McDonald, J. (2017). Reflecting on institutional support for SoTL engagement: developing a conceptual framework. International Journal for Academic Development, 1-14.
  7. Wood, P., & Cajkler, W. (2018). Lesson study: A collaborative approach to scholarship for teaching and learning in higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education42(3), 313-326.
  8. Amundsen, C., & D’Amico, L. (2019). Using Theory of Change to evaluate socially-situated, inquiry-based academic professional development. Studies in Educational Evaluation61, 196-208.
  9. Healey, M., Matthews, K. E., & Cook-Sather, A. (2019). Writing Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Articles for Peer-Reviewed Journals. Teaching & Learning Inquiry7(2), 28-50.

SoTL in Higher Education 

  1. Healey, M. (2000). Developing the scholarship of teaching in higher education: a discipline-based approach. Higher Education Research and Development, 19(2), 169-189.
  2. Wuetherick, B., & Yu, S. (2016). The Canadian teaching commons: The scholarship of teaching and learning in Canadian higher education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning2016(146), 23-30.
  3. Kong, S. C., Lai, M., & Wong, T. L. (2017). Toward a Framework of Studying Scholarship of Learning and Teaching in Higher Education in a Digital Technology Era. In Emerging Practices in Scholarship of Learning and Teaching in a Digital Era (pp. 1-16). Springer, Singapore.
  4. Hutchings, P., Taylor, H., & Ciccone, A. (2011). The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Reconsidered: Institutional Integration and Impact. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  5. Marquis, E., Guitman, R., Black, C., Healey, M., Matthews, K. E., & Dvorakova, L. S. (2019). Growing partnership communities: What experiences of an international institute suggest about developing student-staff partnership in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International56(2), 184-194.
  6. Tight, M. (2018). Tracking the scholarship of teaching and learning. Policy Reviews in Higher Education2(1), 61-78.
  7. Flavell, H., Roberts, L., Fyfe, G., & Broughton, M. (2018). Shifting goal posts: the impact of academic workforce reshaping and the introduction of teaching academic roles on the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. The Australian Educational Researcher45(2), 179-194.
  8. Chng, H. H., & Mårtensson, K. (2020). Leading change from different shores: The challenges of contextualizing the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Teaching & Learning Inquiry8(1), 24-41. 

 

 

 

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *