Hong, L.1*, Radics, G.B.2*, Chng, H.T.1, Murphy, M.3, Yang A.J.4, Muhammad, N.5, Lim, A.2, Estes, J.2, Ragupathi, K.6, Gregorio, V.L.2, Kassem, A.2, Lee, E.T.T.7, Yudistira, M.7, Mitchell, A.8, Sivasothi, N.9, Neo, D.M.1
1Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Science (FOS), NUS
2Department of Sociology & Anthropology, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS), NUS
3Department of English, Linguistics & Theatre Studies, FASS, NUS
4Department of Physics, FOS, NUS
5Department of Geography, FASS, NUS
6Centre for Teaching, Learning, and Technology (CTLT), NUS
7Department of Chemistry, FOS, NUS
8Department of Communications and New Media, FASS, NUS
9Department of Biological Sciences, FOS, NUS
*lin.hong@nus.edu.sg
*radics@nus.edu.sg
Hong, L., Radics, G.B., Chng, H.T., Murphy, M., Yang A.J., Muhammad, N., Lim, A., Estes, J., Ragupathi, K., Gregorio, V.L., Kassem, A., Lee, E.T.T., Yudistira, M., Mitchell, A., Sivasothi, N., & Neo, D.M. (2024). Decoding the Disciplines: Nurturing Malleable Minds of Educators and Students in Arts and Sciences [Lightning Talk]. In Higher Education Conference in Singapore (HECS) 2024, 3 December, National University of Singapore. https://blog.nus.edu.sg/hecs/hecs2024-hong-et-al
SUB-THEME
Others
KEYWORDS
Interdisciplinarity, adaptability, teaching strategies, dialectic thinking, neuroplasticity
CATEGORY
Lightning Talk
EXTENDED ABSTRACT
Oppenheimer did not foresee the impact of his creation, and neither did Great Britain, who bartered opium for tea, foresee the devastation on human health across China. In the modern era, arts students tend to approach science topics with hesitation while students with a background in science tend to overlook humanity with pragmatic solutions. Furthermore, embedded in the Singaporean education system is a hierarchy of disciplines, fostered by rigid testing and grade point cut-offs for specific majors. When faced with an opposing discipline – an unknown, an unfamiliarity – students tend to hold on to certain biases and fears that ultimately need to be overcome to nurture malleable and interdisciplinary thinking (Christou and Judy Wearing, 2015).
The College of Humanities and Sciences (CHS) at the National University of Singapore (NUS) has introduced mandatory interdisciplinary courses (IDC) to the curriculum with some pushback from students, and incomplete guidance for educators. Starting in 2018 and now with 22 IDCs offered as of the Academic Year 2024/2025, our team of IDC course coordinators in the Teaching Enhancement Grants (TEG): Learning Community have been engaging in group sharing and deep conversations on the status of the program, our teaching and student reception. Based on these discussions, the consenting course coordinators systematically probe into the effectiveness of current teaching strategies including teaching activities and assessments through student surveys (containing a mixture of Likert scales and open-ended questions) and peer review of each other’s classes. We investigate interdisciplinary knowledge (disciplinary grounding, perspective taking, and common ground and integration) and core interdisciplinary skills (critical reflection, collaboration, communication, adaptability, and creativity) (Wiegant, 2020; Mansilla and Duraising, 2007). Open-ended responses are analysed through coding the interdisciplinary themes.
Preliminary results have shown that students are quite resistant to non-traditional teaching strategies that they are unfamiliar with, including debates and class interactions. Despite this, their appreciation and understanding of interdisciplinarity knowledge and skills are positive through these activities. It will be a matter of now building up their confidence over the course to reduce their anxieties and enable them to be more comfortable with the uncertainties that are inherent in interdisciplinary education.
With a better understanding of CHS student motivations and their preferences for learning, we can tailor our teaching strategies to promote a positive learning environment for developing their interdisciplinary learning and knowledge.
REFERENCES
Christou, T. M., & Wearing, J. (2015). An interdisciplinary curriculum conversation on fear and learning. In education. 21(1), 42-58. https://doi.org/10.37119/ojs2015.v21i1.203
Mansilla, V. B., & Duraising, E. D. (2007). Targeted assessment of students’ interdisciplinary work: An empirically grounded framework proposed. The Journal of Higher Education. 78(1), 215-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2007.11780874
Wiegant, F. & Team Interdisciplinary and community engaged learning. (2020). Matrix with assessment rubrics of interdisciplinary learning goals & competencies. Utrecht University. https://www.uu.nl/en/education/educational-development-training/knowledge-dossier/how-do-you-assess-interdisciplinary-skills