Engaging Communities in Sustainability

Eunice S. Q. NG 

Ridge View Residential College (RVRC)

E.Ng@nus.edu.sg 

Ng, E. S. Q. (2024). Engaging communities in sustainability [Paper presentation]. In Higher Education Conference in Singapore (HECS) 2024, 3 December, National University of Singapore.  https://blog.nus.edu.sg/hecs/hecs2024-esqng/ ‎

SUB-THEME

Opportunities from Engaging Communities 

KEYWORDS

Interdisciplinary education, sustainability education, environmental stewardship, service learning, experiential learning 

CATEGORY

Paper Presentation

 

EXTENDED ABSTRACT

Sustainability challenges are complex global issues without straightforward solutions, which often invoke feelings of being overwhelmed and powerless within learners (Hickman, 2020; Pickering & Dale, 2024). Scholars and practitioners have recommended for sustainability educators to be aware of learners’ emotional and mental states, and recommended strategies for coping with these ecological emotions (Pihkala, 2020). Such strategies include fostering a sense of personal meaning in sustainability action, providing authentic learning experiences, and engaging in collective pro-environmental action (Olsen et al., 2024). By engaging communities in sustainability, learners can contribute meaningfully to sustainability while witnessing the impact of community participation on sustainability (Restrepo-Mieth et al., 2023). 

 

Offered at Ridge View Residential College (RVRC) in fulfilment of NUS General Education’s Communities and Engagement (CE) pillar, the course RVN2000 “Engaging Communities in Sustainability” explores the role of communities in addressing resource consumption and waste production challenges through field trips and classroom seminars. Field trips were designed to educate about Singapore’s three priority waste streams (Ministry of Sustainability and the Environment, 2020) (see Table 1). As part of an assignment, students were also tasked to interview community members on a sustainability issue to understand their views and motivations towards sustainability.

Table 1 
Course Field Trips

 

These out-of-classroom activities offered students authentic learning experiences, allowing them to go beyond individual pro-environmental action to participate in collective action instead. Being part of a community invoked feelings of empowerment in sustainability, with one student reflecting that “the example of FRC demonstrated how we can initiate changes in our community by ourselves, rather than waiting for others e.g. government to step in”. 

Figure 1. Students rescued 5 tonnes of “ugly food” during a food rescue with FRC.

 

Figure 2. Students sorted through waste collected at NUS University Town’s Resource Sorting Station. 

 

Figure 3. Students observed how e-waste was sorted at ALBA’s E-waste facility in Tuas.

While field trips provided tangible examples of community participation in action, they appeared discrete and disconnected since each community had a different purpose. Hence, a key stage in the course was to actively frame students’ community engagement experiences within a broader framework of community participation. This highlighted the complementarity and contributions of various forms of community participation at the ecosystem level (Sandri, 2021). 

 

Students leveraged Rut et al. (2021)’s Ecologies of Participation framework (see Figure 4) to analyse different community participation approaches’ contributions and limitations vis-à-vis their field trip experiences. In doing so, students found deeper meaning in their out-of-classroom experiences, as evidenced in a student’s reflection that “the most memorable connection I have learnt is the power of the community. Seeing examples from case studies such as Koh Pitak as well as seeing FRC operate first-hand, I have learnt that with high social capital, a strong motivation and goal, we can achieve a lot in terms of pushing for sustainable initiatives”.

Figure 4. Ecologies of community participation in sustainability (Adapted from Rut et al. (2021)

 

By emphasising community participation beyond individual community units, students recognised the significance of having diverse, multiple forms of community participation within the broader ecosystem. Coupled with their personal experiences in engaging with communities in sustainability, students recognised their own role in addressing sustainability challenges and were empowered to be change agents for sustainability. 

 

REFERENCES

Hickman, C. (2020). We need to (find a way to) talk about … Eco-anxiety. Journal of Social Work Practice, 34(4), 411-424. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2020.1844166 

Ministry of Sustainability and the Environment. (2020, 30 July). The Resource Sustainability Act. Retrieved July 12 from https://www.mse.gov.sg/resource-room/category/2020-07-30-resource-sustainability-act/ 

Olsen, E. K., Lawson, D. F., McClain, L. R., & Plummer, J. D. (2024). Heads, hearts, and hands: A systematic review of empirical studies about eco/climate anxiety and environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 1-28.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2024.2315572 

Pickering, G. J., & Dale, G. (2024). The role of perceived powerlessness and other barriers to climate action. Canadian Geographies, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12938 

Pihkala, P. (2020). Eco-Anxiety and Environmental Education. Sustainability, 12(23), 10149. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310149 

Restrepo-Mieth, A., Perry, J., Garnick, J., & Weisberg, M. (2023). Community-based participatory climate action. Global Sustainability, 6, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2023.12 

Rut, M., Davies, A. R., & Ng, H. (2021). Participating in food waste transitions: exploring surplus food redistribution in Singapore through the ecologies of participation framework. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 23(1), 34-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908x.2020.1792859 

Sandri, O. (2021). Providing a ‘point of entry’: Approaches to framing sustainability in curriculum design in Higher Education. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 37(1), 56-68. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2020.19 

Fostering Community and Environmental Stewardship Through RV Learning Forest

CHYE Yi De*, LIM Cheng Puay, and Eunice S. Q. NG

Ridge View Residential College

*chye.yide@u.nus.edu

Chye, Y. D., Lim, C. P., & Ng, E. S. Q. (2024). Fostering community and environmental stewardship through RV learning forest [Lightning Talk]. In Higher Education Conference in Singapore (HECS) 2024, 3 December, National University of Singapore. https://blog.nus.edu.sg/hecs/hecs2024-chye-et-al

 

SUB-THEME

Opportunities from Engaging Communities

KEYWORDS

Engaging communities, Environmental stewardship, Outdoor education, Climate action, Placemaking

CATEGORY

Lightning Talk

EXTENDED ABSTRACT

In highly urbanised and rapidly changing environments, there is often a disconnect between people, their surroundings, and nature (Beery et al., 2023). This can lead to difficulties in forming a strong sense of place attachment and nature connectedness among individuals (Lehmann, 2023). Yet, a sense of place and nature connectedness has been found to foster a sense of agency in sustainability and motivate pro-environmental behaviours (Armitage et al., 2017; Masterson et al., 2019; Nisbet & Zelenski, 2013). Accordingly, embedding nature into placemaking processes, with community-based participation at the core, is essential in nurturing a strong connection between people, place, and the natural world (Bush et al., 2020; Krasny & Delia, 2015).

 

As part of Ridge View Residential College (RVRC)’s outdoor learning programme, RVRC partnered with the National University of Singapore University Campus Infrastructure (NUS UCI) to plant 100 native trees in celebration of RVRC’s 10th Anniversary. This student-led initiative resulted in the creation of “RV Learning Forest” (RVLF) within the College campus. Being a visually prominent and publicly accessible outdoor learning space, RVLF is intended to nurture residents’ connection to nature and their sense of place within the College while enhancing the ecological connectivity within the National University of Singapore (NUS) campus.

 

To ensure that the RVRC community is actively involved in the placemaking process, the planning committee decided against outsourcing the tree planting to contract workers and chose to involve community members instead. 64 participants, including RVRC staff, residents, alumni, and other community groups such as NUS Toddycats and (Nanyang Technological University (NTU) Earthlink, attended the tree planting event (see Figure 1). Through RVLF, participants felt a sense of collective identity, as described by RVRC resident Gillian Harryanto, Year 1, Faculty of Science,

“By planting trees together, residents are united by a common purpose, enabling new friendships to be forged. This strengthens community spirit in RVRC, allowing the College to grow in more ways than one.”HECS2024-ChyeYD-Fig1Figure 1. Participants of the RVLF tree planting event held on 27 January 2024.

 

HECS2024-ChyeYD-Fig2

Figure 2. Participants were guided by RVRC Fellows and experienced volunteers from NUS Toddycats (Photo credit: Yap Koo Gene from RVRC Social Media).

 

RVLF has transformed from a patch of grass into a place used to engage communities on environmental stewardship and the people-nature relationship (see Figure 3). Being part of the tree planting event also inspired members of NTU’s NTreeU to apply certain practices with their student-led reforestation community. Constance Liew, Chairperson of NTreeU, shared that her group “really liked the idea of giving the participants species tags to label their trees. It does help to encourage them to invest more in community tree planting. We ended up doing something similar for our own tree planting event in March”.

HECS2024-ChyeYD-Fig3

Figure 3. RVRC hosted an outdoor learning session to introduce concepts of ecological connectivity and local biodiversity to visiting Secondary School students.

 

Placemaking through RVLF extends beyond a single event as developing a sense of place and nurturing nature connectedness require time. Community members continue to be part of the plot enhancement and maintenance activities. For example, residents designed walking paths during Go Green SG 2024 held in June 2024 (see Figures 4 and 5). Community science initiatives, such as plant labelling and biodiversity monitoring, are ongoing opportunities for residents to participate in. As RVLF planning committee member – Natalie Ong, Year 4, Faculty of Arts and Social Science, shared,

“… the Learning Forest is a community-driven space of learning, restoration, and rest. It started off as a passion project to create a green community-centric space and I’m grateful many others have decided to hop on to join this place-making endeavour.”

HECS2024-ChyeYD-Fig4Figure 4. RVRC residents who were new and repeated RVLF participants joined in the Go Green SG 2024 plot enhancement event.

HECS2024-ChyeYD-Fig5Figure 5. Participants used recycled wooden furniture and repurposed gravel to create a walking path that facilitates entry to RVLF.

 

Leveraging a community-based participatory approach towards RVLF has facilitated stronger connections between residents, the College campus, and nature (Restrepo-Mieth et al., 2023). Looking ahead, RVLF will continue to serve as a place to connect different communities, develop a common eco-identity amongst RVRC residents, and provide opportunities for communities to engage in environmental civic service (Hoffman & Doody, 2015).

REFERENCES

Armitage, D., Alexander, S., Andrachuk, M., Berdej, S., Brown, S., Nayak, P., Pittman, J., & Rathwell, K. (2017). Governing the coastal commons: Communities, multi-level networks and governance transformations in the coastal commons. Routledge, 231-251.

Beery, T., Olafson, A. S., Gentin, S., Maurer, M., Stålhammar, S., Albert, C., Bieling, C., Buijs, A., Fagerholm, N., Garcia‐Martin, M., Plieninger, T., & Raymond, C. M. (2023). Disconnection from nature: Expanding our understanding of human–nature relations. People and Nature, 5(2), 470-488. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10451

Bush, J., Hernandez-Santin, C., & Hes, D. (2020). Nature in Place: Placemaking in the Biosphere. In Hes, D., Hernandez-Santin, C. (eds) Placemaking Fundamentals for the Built Environment (pp. 39-61). Palgrave Macmillan.

Hoffman, A. J., & Doody, S. (2015). Build a fruit tree orchard and they will come: Creating an eco-identity via community gardening activities. Community Development Journal, 50(1), 104-
120. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsu023

Krasny, M. E., & Delia, J. (2015). Natural area stewardship as part of campus sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.019

Lehmann, S. (2023). Reconnecting with nature: Developing urban spaces in the age of climate change. Emerald Open Research, 1(5).https://doi.org/10.1108/EOR-05-2023-0001

Masterson, V. A., Enqvist, J. P., Stedman, R. C., & Tengö, M. (2019). Sense of place in social– ecological systems: From theory to empirics. Sustainability Science, 14, 555-564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00695-8

Nisbet, E. K., & Zelenski, J. M. (2013). The NR-6: A new brief measure of nature relatedness. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00813

Restrepo-Mieth, A., Perry, J., Garnick, J., & Weisberg, M. (2023). Community-based participatory climate action. Global Sustainability, 6, 555-564. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2023.12

 

Viewing Message: 1 of 1.
Warning

Blog.nus accounts will move to SSO login soon. Once implemented, only current NUS staff and students will be able to log in to Blog.nus. Public blogs remain readable to non-logged in users. (More information.)