Engaging Persons with Disabilities Through Systems Engineering Projects

Aaron Eng Seng CHIA 

Department of Industrial Systems Engineering and Management, 
College of Design and Engineering (CDE) 

aaron_chia@nus.edu.sg  

Chia, A. E. S. (2024). Engaging persons with disabilities through systems engineering projects [Paper presentation]. In Higher Education Conference in Singapore (HECS) 2024, 3 December, National University of Singapore. https://blog.nus.edu.sg/hecs/hecs2024-aeschia/

SUB-THEME

Opportunities from Engaging Communities 

KEYWORDS

Engaging communities, systems engineering projects, person with disabilities, social responsibility 

CATEGORY

Paper Presentation

 

INTRODUCTION 

Universities have social responsibilities manifested as community engagement, community outreach programmes, civic engagement, and public engagement (Esfijani et al., 2012). Since Generation Z placed greater emphasis on their role in the world and considered it part of their social responsibility to improve it (Ernst & Young, 2023), universities can play a greater role in this. However, in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines, there are not many intervention programmes to enhance social responsibility (specifically engaging communities). One example is the ENACT (engage, navigate, anticipate, conduct, and take action) programme by Hwang et al. (2023).  

 

In a systems engineering course taught, students design and build products through a system development life cycle as shown in Figure 1.  In each stage, there is a need to engage relevant stakeholders. 

 

This study aims to study the impact of engaging real stakeholders (communities) for engineering projects on students’ learning and thereby also foster social responsibility. The projects of past students (first group) usually did not engage communities. Students carried out literature reviews and assumed themselves to be the stakeholders of the system. Examples of such products include multifunctional baby bottles, safe chopping boards etc. In the second group of students, they were required to engage persons with disabilities (PwD) to design systems to, for example, enable persons living with dementia (PLD) to travel independently, or help the elderly with hearing impairments to work in cafes.  

Figure 1. System Development Lifecycle (Source: Eby (2017)

 

METHODOLOGY 

After completion of each group project, students were interviewed on the challenges of the project and possible improvements. A semi-structured interview was employed based on its suitability (Ruslin et al, 2022). One of the students in the group was tasked to record and transcribe the interview for inclusion in their report. As an instructor, the author also observed how well the project was carried out. 

 

FINDINGS 

The first group of students found that it was challenging to gather actual requirements since they might not be the users of the products. The requirements were obtained from third parties such as the Internet or themselves. One suggested improvement was to have projects which involved real stakeholders. It was observed by the instructor that students often missed out the needs of the other stakeholders in the system. For example, the requirements of a baby bottle should not focus just on the baby but also the needs of the parents.  

 

In the second group, some students found difficulty in having direct access to PwDs. While SG Enable supports such projects, they were reluctant to give direct access to some types of PwDs (with good reasons). They often served as intermediaries instead. Sometimes the students resorted to finding such stakeholders from their circle of friends. Students also faced difficulties in trying to communicate with some PwDs, for example, communicating with the deaf. Moreover, the challenges faced by the PwDs might not be articulated clearly as their perceptions of their environments were often different. The students also found that the product did not exist in isolation with the user— often other stakeholders need to be consulted—they could provide additional insights to the design of the product. The instructor found that the students produced better outcomes and learnings via such engagements.  

 

CONCLUSIONS 

The systems engineering projects with PwDs help students to engage communities. They were able to elicit real needs and foster social responsibility to become better citizens and engineers. They learnt the challenges of engaging certain types of stakeholders and found it meaningful that their projects could benefit such communities. However, it requires more effort on the instructor’s part to find such projects, spend time with external organisations, and help students to engage the communities. 

 

REFERENCES

Ali, M., Mustapha, I., Osman, S., & Hassan, U. (2021). University Social Responsibility: A review of conceptual evolution and its thematic analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 286, 124931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124931 

Eby, K. (2017, June 27) The ultimate guide to understanding and using a system development life cycle, Retrieved from: https://www.smartsheet.com/system-development-life-cycle-guide 

Ernst & Young LLP (2023) How can understanding the influence of Gen Z today empower your tomorrow? Retrieved from https://www.ey.com/en_us/consulting/2023-gen-z-study 

Esfijani, A., Hussain, F.K., Chang, E. (2012). An approach to university social responsibility ontology development through text analyses, International Conference on Human System Interaction. pp. 1e7. https://doi.org/10.1109/HSI.2012.10 

Hwang, Y., Ko, Y., Shim, S. S., Ok, S., Lee, H. (2023), International Journal of STEM Education (2023) 10:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00402-1 

Ruslin, R., Mashuri, S., Sarib, M., Alhabsyi, F. and Syam, H. (2022) Semi-structured Interview: A Methodological Reflection on the Development of a Qualitative Research Instrument, Educational Studies, Vol. 12. 22-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.9790/7388-1201052229. 

Yin, R. K. (2011). Applications of case study research. Sage. 

Fostering Community and Environmental Stewardship Through RV Learning Forest

CHYE Yi De*, LIM Cheng Puay, and Eunice S. Q. NG

Ridge View Residential College

*chye.yide@u.nus.edu

Chye, Y. D., Lim, C. P., & Ng, E. S. Q. (2024). Fostering community and environmental stewardship through RV learning forest [Lightning Talk]. In Higher Education Conference in Singapore (HECS) 2024, 3 December, National University of Singapore. https://blog.nus.edu.sg/hecs/hecs2024-chye-et-al

 

SUB-THEME

Opportunities from Engaging Communities

KEYWORDS

Engaging communities, Environmental stewardship, Outdoor education, Climate action, Placemaking

CATEGORY

Lightning Talk

EXTENDED ABSTRACT

In highly urbanised and rapidly changing environments, there is often a disconnect between people, their surroundings, and nature (Beery et al., 2023). This can lead to difficulties in forming a strong sense of place attachment and nature connectedness among individuals (Lehmann, 2023). Yet, a sense of place and nature connectedness has been found to foster a sense of agency in sustainability and motivate pro-environmental behaviours (Armitage et al., 2017; Masterson et al., 2019; Nisbet & Zelenski, 2013). Accordingly, embedding nature into placemaking processes, with community-based participation at the core, is essential in nurturing a strong connection between people, place, and the natural world (Bush et al., 2020; Krasny & Delia, 2015).

 

As part of Ridge View Residential College (RVRC)’s outdoor learning programme, RVRC partnered with the National University of Singapore University Campus Infrastructure (NUS UCI) to plant 100 native trees in celebration of RVRC’s 10th Anniversary. This student-led initiative resulted in the creation of “RV Learning Forest” (RVLF) within the College campus. Being a visually prominent and publicly accessible outdoor learning space, RVLF is intended to nurture residents’ connection to nature and their sense of place within the College while enhancing the ecological connectivity within the National University of Singapore (NUS) campus.

 

To ensure that the RVRC community is actively involved in the placemaking process, the planning committee decided against outsourcing the tree planting to contract workers and chose to involve community members instead. 64 participants, including RVRC staff, residents, alumni, and other community groups such as NUS Toddycats and (Nanyang Technological University (NTU) Earthlink, attended the tree planting event (see Figure 1). Through RVLF, participants felt a sense of collective identity, as described by RVRC resident Gillian Harryanto, Year 1, Faculty of Science,

“By planting trees together, residents are united by a common purpose, enabling new friendships to be forged. This strengthens community spirit in RVRC, allowing the College to grow in more ways than one.”HECS2024-ChyeYD-Fig1Figure 1. Participants of the RVLF tree planting event held on 27 January 2024.

 

HECS2024-ChyeYD-Fig2

Figure 2. Participants were guided by RVRC Fellows and experienced volunteers from NUS Toddycats (Photo credit: Yap Koo Gene from RVRC Social Media).

 

RVLF has transformed from a patch of grass into a place used to engage communities on environmental stewardship and the people-nature relationship (see Figure 3). Being part of the tree planting event also inspired members of NTU’s NTreeU to apply certain practices with their student-led reforestation community. Constance Liew, Chairperson of NTreeU, shared that her group “really liked the idea of giving the participants species tags to label their trees. It does help to encourage them to invest more in community tree planting. We ended up doing something similar for our own tree planting event in March”.

HECS2024-ChyeYD-Fig3

Figure 3. RVRC hosted an outdoor learning session to introduce concepts of ecological connectivity and local biodiversity to visiting Secondary School students.

 

Placemaking through RVLF extends beyond a single event as developing a sense of place and nurturing nature connectedness require time. Community members continue to be part of the plot enhancement and maintenance activities. For example, residents designed walking paths during Go Green SG 2024 held in June 2024 (see Figures 4 and 5). Community science initiatives, such as plant labelling and biodiversity monitoring, are ongoing opportunities for residents to participate in. As RVLF planning committee member – Natalie Ong, Year 4, Faculty of Arts and Social Science, shared,

“… the Learning Forest is a community-driven space of learning, restoration, and rest. It started off as a passion project to create a green community-centric space and I’m grateful many others have decided to hop on to join this place-making endeavour.”

HECS2024-ChyeYD-Fig4Figure 4. RVRC residents who were new and repeated RVLF participants joined in the Go Green SG 2024 plot enhancement event.

HECS2024-ChyeYD-Fig5Figure 5. Participants used recycled wooden furniture and repurposed gravel to create a walking path that facilitates entry to RVLF.

 

Leveraging a community-based participatory approach towards RVLF has facilitated stronger connections between residents, the College campus, and nature (Restrepo-Mieth et al., 2023). Looking ahead, RVLF will continue to serve as a place to connect different communities, develop a common eco-identity amongst RVRC residents, and provide opportunities for communities to engage in environmental civic service (Hoffman & Doody, 2015).

REFERENCES

Armitage, D., Alexander, S., Andrachuk, M., Berdej, S., Brown, S., Nayak, P., Pittman, J., & Rathwell, K. (2017). Governing the coastal commons: Communities, multi-level networks and governance transformations in the coastal commons. Routledge, 231-251.

Beery, T., Olafson, A. S., Gentin, S., Maurer, M., Stålhammar, S., Albert, C., Bieling, C., Buijs, A., Fagerholm, N., Garcia‐Martin, M., Plieninger, T., & Raymond, C. M. (2023). Disconnection from nature: Expanding our understanding of human–nature relations. People and Nature, 5(2), 470-488. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10451

Bush, J., Hernandez-Santin, C., & Hes, D. (2020). Nature in Place: Placemaking in the Biosphere. In Hes, D., Hernandez-Santin, C. (eds) Placemaking Fundamentals for the Built Environment (pp. 39-61). Palgrave Macmillan.

Hoffman, A. J., & Doody, S. (2015). Build a fruit tree orchard and they will come: Creating an eco-identity via community gardening activities. Community Development Journal, 50(1), 104-
120. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsu023

Krasny, M. E., & Delia, J. (2015). Natural area stewardship as part of campus sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.019

Lehmann, S. (2023). Reconnecting with nature: Developing urban spaces in the age of climate change. Emerald Open Research, 1(5).https://doi.org/10.1108/EOR-05-2023-0001

Masterson, V. A., Enqvist, J. P., Stedman, R. C., & Tengö, M. (2019). Sense of place in social– ecological systems: From theory to empirics. Sustainability Science, 14, 555-564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00695-8

Nisbet, E. K., & Zelenski, J. M. (2013). The NR-6: A new brief measure of nature relatedness. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00813

Restrepo-Mieth, A., Perry, J., Garnick, J., & Weisberg, M. (2023). Community-based participatory climate action. Global Sustainability, 6, 555-564. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2023.12

 

Viewing Message: 1 of 1.
Warning

Blog.nus accounts will move to SSO login soon. Once implemented, only current NUS staff and students will be able to log in to Blog.nus. Public blogs remain readable to non-logged in users. (More information.)