Learning In Action: Navigating The Implementation Phase Of Blended Learning Courses

Zi Zhao LIEU 

Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science (FOS)
Special Programme in Science, FOS 

dbslzz@nus.edu.sg  

Lieu, Z. Z. (2024). Learning in action: Navigating the implementation phase of blended learning courses [Lightning talk]. In Higher Education Conference in Singapore (HECS) 2024, 3 December, National University of Singapore. https://blog.nus.edu.sg/hecs/hecs2024-zzlieu/

SUB-THEME

Opportunities from Engaging Communities; Opportunities from Wellbeing 

KEYWORDS

Blended learning, Active Learning, Student Engagement, Community of Inquiry 

CATEGORY

Lightning Talk

EXTENDED ABSTRACT

Blended learning is becoming a norm in many higher learning institutions, with the benefits of face-to-face interactions and the flexibility of online learning (Vaughan, 2007, Liu et al., 2024).  While this innovative model offers learners many advantages, it is not without unique challenges, particularly for those new to this learning environment (Armellini et al., 2023, Kember et al, 2023). Analysis of past student feedback has indicated that while students can understand and define the terms blended learning and active learning, they are often clueless about how their learning is carried out practically in the course (Figure 1). This creates a perception that a course taught in the blended learning mode is often workload-heavy, time-consuming, and difficult to follow/learn. To harness the full potential of blended learning, students must wholeheartedly embrace the course’s learning design and recognise how it can help them achieve the intended learning outcomes (ILOs). 

Figure 1. Figure showing student understanding of “blended learning” and whether they knew how the course will be carried out. 

Development of a workshop to orientate students in blended learning 

To do so, an in-class workshop was designed to help orientate students to the blended learning course. This workshop consists of three parts: (1) An introduction to the online learning environment (CANVAS), with a focus on navigating the page for learning; (2) An introduction to learning strategies and how a student should manage their time in the course, and (3) an introduction to the face-to-face classroom learning environment with the focus on practical classroom activities (quiz, case study, and in-class presentation). This is usually done in the first class of the course, and then a post-semester survey is carried out to understand the students’ perceptions and learning. 

 

How has the workshop helped students understand and adapt to blended learning? 

Using a survey instrument, we analysed the students’ perceptions and understanding of the learning environment and the relevance of the in-class activities for one postgraduate and one undergraduate course. Regarding navigating the online blended learning environment, our survey data indicates that the students could navigate the user interface and identify relevant material for their weekly learning (Table 1). End-of-semester feedback indicates that the course material on CANVAS was easy to follow, and it was clear to the student what needed to be learnt each week. 

 

Table 1
Navigating the Online Learning Environments (post-course survey). Students were asked to rate the following statement (1 for “Strongly Disagree” to 5 for “Strongly Agree”) and the rating shown is the average.
 

 

We next analyse the students’ understanding and perceptions of the in-class learning activities. Our survey data showed that the students found the in-class activities aligned with the learning objective (Table 2). In addition, the nature of the learning activity allows for strong engagement between the student and the learning material. 

 

Table 2
Student perceptions of the in-class learning activities (post-course survey). Students were asked to rate the following statement (1 for “Strongly Disagree” to 5 for “Strongly Agree”) and the rating shown is an average rating.
 

 

In conclusion, getting students to embrace the course design and understand how it can help them achieve their learning outcomes, especially in blended learning is important. Based on our survey results, we successfully used an orientation workshop-style lesson to help students understand the why behind the pedagogical method, the logistics, and how they should interact with the learning material. We recommend integrating this orientation workshop into blended learning courses for student learning. 

REFERENCES

Armellini, A., Teixeira Antunes, V., & Howe, R. (2021). Student perspectives on learning experiences in a higher education active blended learning context. TechTrends, 65(4), 433-443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00593-w

Kember, D., Ellis, R. A., Fan, S., & Trimble, A. (Eds.). (2023). Adapting to Online and Blended Learning in Higher Education: Supporting the Retention and Success of the Expanded and Diversified Intake. Springer. 

Liu, Q., Chen, L., Feng, X., Bai, X., Ma, Z. (2024). Supporting Students and Instructors in Blended Learning. In: Li, M., Han, X., Cheng, J. (eds) Handbook of Educational Reform Through Blended Learning. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6269-3_5 

Vaughan, N. (2007). Perspectives on blended learning in higher education. International Journal on E-learning, 6(1), 81–94. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/6310/

Reflective Learning: The Use of Mind Maps in Biodiversity Courses

Theresa Linting SU*, Weiting XU, and Zeehan Jaafar

Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science

*theresasu@nus.edu.sg

Su, T. L., Xu, W., & Jaafar, Z. (2024). Reflective Learning: The Use of Mind Maps in Biodiversity Courses [Lightning Talk]. In Higher Education Conference in Singapore (HECS) 2024, 3 December, National University of Singapore. https://blog.nus.edu.sg/hecs/hecs2024-su-et-al

 

SUB-THEME

Others

KEYWORDS

Active learning, reflective learning, mind mapping, education tool

CATEGORY

Lightning Talk

EXTENDED ABSTRACT

Mind maps are visual representations of information organised in a hierarchical but non-linear manner. This method enables practitioners to visualise complex concepts and elucidate relationships between seemingly disjunct ideas. With a central theme surrounded by related sub-themes, and concepts or ideas connected by branches, this method is designed to mimic the brain’s natural thought processes (Buzan et al., 2010). The use of mind maps has been demonstrated to enhance memory retention, creativity, and comprehension; primarily because this method engages both analytical and creative hemispheres of the brain (Nesbit & Adesope, 2006). Compared to traditional note-taking methods, students who employed mind maps were shown to improve their long-term memory by 10% (Farrand et al., 2002); further corroborating its effectiveness. Mind maps are therefore powerful tools for learners to organise and integrate knowledge in a meaningful way.

 

This study leverages the broad adoption of mind maps in many scholastic settings. We assess individual student learning through reflection and syntheses of course material. Students reading two Level 4000 courses that are similar in approaches and content structure — LSM4257 “Aquatic Vertebrate Diversity” and/or LSM4266 “Aquatic Invertebrate Diversity” — were (will be) assigned two exercises. Students attempt the first exercise at the beginning of the course, comprising one mind map with the course title as the central idea. The second exercise can only be attempted towards the end of the course after the majority of contents (i.e., lectures, laboratory sessions, field trips) have been covered. In addition to attempting a second mind map, students must also complete a reflection piece that describes their experience with the course they read.

 

To begin, the students are tasked to create a mind map of Aquatic (In)Vertebrate Diversity after the first lecture, drawing on their current understanding of the topic. It could be information from a previous course, documentary, or even personal experience. Students were guided on how to create a mind map with the central theme, with branches (e.g., major phyla, ecosystems, ecological function, etc.) and sub-branches (e.g., specific organisms, examples, etc.). They were also asked to include visual enhancement wherever possible (e.g., colour-coding, sketches, symbols, and spatial organisation to emphasise connections and patterns, etc.).

 

With reference to the mind map produced, students were tasked to write a personal reflection with the following prompts — (1) How did the mind-mapping exercise enhance your overview of this topic? (2) Identify at least two (sub-) branches of interest to you and elaborate on your curiosity. (3) How can applying mind-mapping and reflective learning techniques benefit your approach to other academic inquiries?

 

At the end of the course, students were asked to repeat the mind map and reflection exercise, with the additional prompt of comparing the initial and final mind map and if there was/were any change(s) and/or shift(s).

a38 - fig1 (a)a38 - fig 1 (b)

Figure 1. Initial and final mind maps of Student A.

 

To analyse the mind maps, we intend to include steps that collectively allow us to understand and interpret both the hierarchical structure and the interrelationships presented. The depths and breadths of the subject may be discussed through the primary and secondary branches, which denote the main topics and peripheral ideas, respectively. The use of colours, symbols, and images may also provide insights into the cognitive emphasis placed on different ideas (Buzan & Buzan, 2010). We can also conduct qualitative analysis to interpret the connections and the logical flow between concepts, which can offer a deeper understanding of the learner’s thought processes and organisational skills (Eppler, 2006). Additionally, mind maps can be assessed quantitatively through parameters like node count, branch length, and textual density to provide a more objective analysis (Davies, 2011). Lastly, thematic analyses of the reflections can provide an added dimension to our understanding of the student’s learning process. By combining visual inspection with qualitative and quantitative methods of mind maps and reflections, we hope to comprehensively evaluate how the students learn in the two listed aquatic diversity courses.

REFERENCES

Buzan, T., Buzan, B., & Harrison, J. (2010). The mind map book: Unlock your creativity, boost your memory, change your life. Pearson BBC Active.

Davies, M. (2011). Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: What are the differences and do they matter? Higher Education, 62, 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9387-6

Eppler, M. J. (2006). A comparison between concept maps, mind maps, conceptual diagrams, and visual metaphors as complementary tools for knowledge construction and sharing.
Information Visualization, 5(3), 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500131

Farrand, P., Hussain, F., & Hennessy, E. (2002). The efficacy of the ‘mind map’ study technique. Medical Education, 36(5), 426–431. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01205.x

Nesbit, J. C., & Adesope, O. O. (2006). Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 413–448. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076003413

Viewing Message: 1 of 1.
Warning

Blog.nus accounts will move to SSO login soon. Once implemented, only current NUS staff and students will be able to log in to Blog.nus. Public blogs remain readable to non-logged in users. (More information.)