Shrimp is one of Thailand’s most agro-food exports, garnered as the world’s largest exporter in 2011. Shrimps cultivations is traditionally confined to narrow bands of coastal area, where large volume of sea water could be easily be filled upon closure. As Thailand possesses over 2700km of coastline and has an ideal tropical climate perfect for shrimp farming, this propelled Thailand into becoming a global leader of shrimp. Furthermore Thailand has access to “aquaculture technologies, low agricultural wages and the availability of government tax incentives” were all vital in developing shrimp farming in Thailand (Phornprapha, 2019).Thai shrimps are mainly exported to the US, EU, Japan and other markets (ILO, 2015), with 32 per cent of total shrimp imports in the US. The shrimp industry directly employs 700,000 workers, of which 80% of whom are migrant workers. Most of these migrants are from Myanmar, with smaller percentage from Cambodia and Lao PDR (ILO, 2015).  The dynamic labour force are involved in varying aspects of the Shrimp supply chain, including shrimp farms, shrimp market, pre-processing, secondary processing, and exported for sales (Fig 1). However, Thai shrimp industry have been under scrutiny for bringing about exploitative actant with unsustainable production processes in the supply chain. On top of that, the industry has a hidden cost: human trafficking and labour exploitation are indigenous in the largely unregulated pre-processing stage of shrimp production (EJF, 2013). This cost is a reflection to the reputation of the sector as one with undesirable working conditions, desensitising the locals and thus creating an insufficient supply of Thai workers in this industry. It is thus, important as we explore the uncovered truths behind this dominant export driven industry in Thailand to illuminate the growth of Thai shrimp industry at the expense of human exploitation.

Fig 1: Illustration of Thai Shrimp industry supply chain

The shrimp industry is growingly swiftly and revolutionising, exploring different methods of productions, shifting away from the traditional wild shrimp farming. Instead, the Thai shrimp industry established a production approach of shrimp farming, with 90 per cent of shrimp produced in Thailand coming from farms today. (CSR Asia 2013: 5). This alternative aquaculture provides a temporary relief to the earth natural resource, where the ocean is already under too much pressure to be the sole resource. The continuous extraction and over-reliance would result in decades of overfishing and environmental factors that are having a negative impact on many seafood populations.

Shrimp farming in Thailand is embedding in a supply chain system that involves shrimps being raised in farms, that are fed on domestically manufactured shrimp feed produced from fishmeal factories, that purchase small, left over fish from fishing vessels. Farmed shrimps rely on technological advancements, using ultra-intensive systems that produces greater yields, coupled with much higher levels of inputs, including antibiotics, feed and pesticides, than lower intensity systems. In order to gain higher profits, Thai shrimp industry adopted an  intensification of shrimp farming to meet the increasing global demand. This increase in production leads to the development focus that drives Thai shrimp industry to go beyond their means by commodifying nature at the expense of exploiting the environment. With more land clearance for growth and intensification of shrimp farms, it has resulted in mangrove destruction, water pollution as pesticides are used in shrimp farming process, heavily pouting and contaminating the waters. This excessive, uncontrolled growth of Thai shrimp farming, lead to an outbreak of EMS (Early Mortality Sydrome), casing a sharp reductions in production. This illustrates how the attempt to expand in production has the ability to result in an unintended consequence that still suffers the effects of EMS until today, with Thailand still recovering in terms of production and export volume (ILO, 2015). Thus shrimp aquaculture in particular has a very grim reputation, with cases of harvesting disease-ridden crustaceans from antibiotic-filled swamps amid the dead mangroves (Clark, 2019).  On top of that, these aquaculture produces pollutants that endangers the surrounding environment and threatening the existence of its special species.

Produce from shrimp farms are then traded in the vast Samut Sakhon seafood market, where it is sold on to pre-processing factories for first round of shrimp production. The nature of pre-processing factories are often considered dangerous, dirt and difficult (Adams, 2015), with workers often being underpaid. These dire working conditions apparent in the Thai shrimp industry have desensitised many, to the extent that some migrants are robbed to motivate them to work on fishing boats, selling their lives to the sea with almost no opportunity of returning. These workers are being reduced to mere “commodities”, being bought, sold, transported and resold. The capitalist economic context attached to the human bodies, justify Castree notion of nature as the human body, a process of theoretical abstraction that one can separate the body out as a physical thing from the identities and personalities of the people who “inhabit” it (Castree, 2003). On top of that, the industry supports child labour, mainly in small businesses and in areas with minimal training required. These children are ages between 5 and 17, with a percentage of them working in conditions classified as hazardous (ILO 2013: 6). These working conditions are especially harmful to the children, with repeated injuries, irregulated break times, many work nights shifts during wee hours and most of the children do not attend school (Tang 2013:33).

 

The consequences of consistent and rising demand for inexpensive shrimps has resulted in a capitalist focus transforming bits of nature and ecosystem by driving Thai shrimp industry to becoming one that is profit maximising, simultaneously exploiting both the environment and labour. We got to be more aware and acknowledge that there is a need to change this growing demand. Shrimp is just one of the many examples of food security related issues, which has direct impact to environmental pollution.  Thus, as consumers, we have to be aware of the what consuming, not just at surface level, but the whole process that goes behind getting the food to where it is for us today at the final step of purchasing it.

References

Adams, F. H. (2015). Migrant child labour in the Thai shrimp industry – child … Retrieved March 25, 2021, from http://www.terredeshommes.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/shrimp-study-eng-3MB.pdf

Castree, N. (2003). Commodifying what nature? Progress in Human Geography, 27(3), 273-297. doi:10.1191/0309132503ph428oa

Clark, M. (2019, October 15). What are we supposed to think about shrimp? Retrieved March 25, 2021, from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/15/dining/shrimp-sourcing-united-states.html

CSR Asia: Opportunities for Inclusive Business. A Case Study of the Shrimp Value Chain. (2013, March 16). Retrieved March 25, 2021, from http://www.csr-asia.com/report/FINAL_Shrimp_industry_report

ILO. Migrant and child labor in THAILAND’S shrimp and other seafood Supply chains: Labor conditions and the decision to study or work. (2015, September 15). Retrieved March 25, 2021, from https://www.ilo.org/asia/publications/WCMS_402971/lang–en/index.htm

Tang, K. T. (2013). Community partnerships for the Prevention of the Worst Forms of Child Labor among Migrant Children in Samut Sakhon, Thailand. Retrieved March 25, 2021, from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/144152624.pdf