30X30:Our Hunger for Food Security

The story of food security in Singapore

our food production history

“To understand the present and anticipate the future, one must know enough of the past. Enough to have a sense of the history of the people. One must appreciate not merely what took place but more especially why it took place and in that particular way. That is true of individuals, as it is for nations”
—Lee Kuan Yew, during the PAP’s 25th Anniversary Rally, 1980

In the previous post, we learnt about the 30by30 goal. Before we think about how this goal can be achieved, let us know more about the context of food production in Singapore. How was the farming scene like, and how did the idea of food security come about?

The Japanese Occupation of Singapore was a very trying time. Growing up, I heard stories of my grandparents growing tapioca for sustenance. What was the “new normal” once the war ended? Here’s what I understand (from Chou 2014 ) about the local farming situation from the post-war years. Most farms were family-run. Being smaller, these farms were better able to react to changes in the market as compared to commercial ones. Such farms were able to meet local needs up to the 80s. However, pig farms were relocated to Punggol in the 70 due to concerns that wastewater would affect local water catchments (Tortajada et al, 2013).

However, 1984 marked a change in the government’s priorities (Tortajada & Zhang, 2016). In line with the transition to a knowledge-based economy, Primary Production Department Director, Mr. Goh Keng Swee, announced that Singapore no longer aimed to be self-sufficient for food. Instead, Singaporeans should specialise in areas higher up the value chain and rely on trade to meet other needs. The last pig farms in Punggol closed in 1989. Many areas involved in farming were converted into agrotechnology parks.  Through these parks, modern farms can adopt each other’s best practises and technology more easily, resulting in higher and more sustainable yield.

Author at an agrotechnology park in 2006

Author at an agrotechnology park in 2006.  Unfortunately, the only pictures I have are from that field trip when I was seven.

So what changed since 1984 that raised the importance of food security?

In 2007, there was a global food crisis. Due to drought and the shift to biofuel production, food prices rose dramatically leading to panic buying. The government highlighted that there was a national stockpile of rice – this was brought up again this year.

My biggest takeaway from the history of the food supply in Singapore is the importance of the government’s direction. 1984 showed that a decision to end self-sufficiency is a lot easier than efforts to raise it since 2007. The government needs to be clear what the goal is post-2030. T Ambiguity will only result in farmers hesitating to seize opportunities due to fears of being left in the lurch as pig farmers were back in the late 80s.

I understand why pig farming was phased out in the 80s. There was a risk that farmers would be left behind in Singapore’s march towards progress, creating a rural-urban divide. As they say, you can’t make an omelette without breaking a few eggs. Had the status quo been kept, the agriculture scene in Singapore may not have evolved into the technologically intensive scene we have today. It is also not fair to say that we could have maintained our sufficiency in pork as our population has almost doubled since then. However, keeping some sort of target for food sufficiency in mind would have been good. In hindsight, given the importance attributed to water security, the laissez-faire approach to food security seems out of character.

What do you think about the decision to shift away from self-sufficiency in the 80s? Was it a misstep, or was it more important that all Singaporeans shifted to jobs further up the value chain? What are your thoughts on the number of fish and egg farms in relation to the percentage supplied locally? Let me know in the comments.



Tortajada, C., Joshi, Y. K., & Biswa, A. K. (2013). The Singapore water story: Sustainable development in an urban city-state (p. 142). New York, NY: Routledge. Call no.: SING 363.61095957 TOR.

Tortajada, Cecilia, and Hongzhou Zhang. “Food Policy in Singapore.” Reference Module in Food Science, 2016, doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-100596-5.21083-4.

Chou, Cynthia. “Agriculture and the End of Farming in Singapore.” Nature Contained: Environmental Histories of Singapore, by Timothy P. Barnard, NUS Press, 2014, pp. 216–240, muse-jhu-edu.libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/chapter/1096622.

Taiganides, E. P. Pig Waste Management and Recycling: the Singapore Experience. International Development Research Centre, 1992.


  1. See Toh Ee Kin

    September 11, 2020 at 3:09 PM

    Hi, I really recommend reading Nature Contained: Environmental Histories of Singapore. I’ve taken a lot of reference from one of the chapters “Chapter 7: Agriculture and the End of Farming in Singapore” (Chou, 2014). The rest of the book looks pretty interesting too.
    NUS users can access it here: https://muse-jhu-edu.libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/book/30089

  2. Hey Ee Kin!

    Interesting topic! I personally do think about Singapore’s local produce scene quite often, so your blog is a great way to provoke more thinking haha.

    As the axiom goes, “hindsight is always in perfect vision”. Although Singapore currently promotes self-sufficiency in food security, we cannot neglect that the choices made in the past was also made with the best intentions, and best knowledge at the time. I just hope that the efforts to promote local produce among Singaporeans are effective so we can move towards self-sufficiency now and not delay it longer.

    With that in mind, are you considering a post on the efforts in Singapore to increase demand for locally produced food? Also, I’ve read a bit about sustainable methods of farming and aquaculture in Singapore, do you think that’s something you’d discuss?

    Looking forward to your future posts!


    • See Toh Ee Kin

      September 12, 2020 at 3:31 PM

      Hi Anna, thanks for stopping by.

      I agree, decisions in the past were made with the limited knowledge available at that time. Anti-globarisation and the effect of climate on food supply may not have been that big of a thing then. Similarly, we need to think if there is anything we are overlooking while pursuing food security.

      Yeap, I will be talking about fish farms. The demand side of things will probably come slightly later too. At this stage, I’m still reading up more before I start writing.

      Hope to hear your thoughts then.

      • So this comment is for you and Anna. I see an opportunity for you to work together, because Anna’s blogging about non-traditional foods and I see interesting ways to relate her topic to the 30×30 plan. This could be an opportunity for you to create complementary posts, for example, or to do primary research together. Just something to think about.

        • See Toh Ee Kin

          September 17, 2020 at 8:08 PM

          Hi Dr Coleman,

          Thanks for the suggestion, we’re seeing what we can work on together.
          Have a great week ahead.


  3. Dear Ee kin!

    What an insightful read! I think Singapore’s move away from food self-sufficiency was inevitable, given that it was rapidly developing and had more mouths to feed. Perhaps if Singapore had not done so in the 80s, it probably would have made the move in later years.

    • See Toh Ee Kin

      September 13, 2020 at 3:56 PM

      Hi Joseph,

      Yep, I think that even if there wasn’t a conscious effort to move away from self-sufficiency in the 80s, I doubt our farms would have been able to keep up. After all, it wasn’t just that our population was increasing, but also that more meat per capita was consumed as income levels rose.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


Skip to toolbar