“Praise, Blame, and Demandingness” by Rick Morris

Consequentialism has been challenged on the grounds that it is too demanding. I will respond to the problem of demandingness differently from previous accounts. In the first part of the paper, I argue that consequentialism requires us to distinguish the justification of an act ϕ from the justification of an act ψ, where ψ is an act of praise or blame.

In the second part of the paper, I confront the problem of demandingness.   I do not attempt to rule out the objection; instead, I argue that if certain plausible empirical claims about moral motivation are true, we morally ought not to blame people for failing to meet certain very demanding obligations. With this theory, we create a space in consequentialism for intuitions questioning the plausibility of demanding obligations.

I conclude the paper by showing that separate justifications for ϕ and ψ may also give us a theoretical niche for intuitions about supererogation.

Philosophy Seminar Series
Date: Thursday, 24 March 2016
Time: 2pm – 4pm
Venue: AS3 #05-23
Speaker: Rick Morris
Moderator: Dr Qu Hsueh Ming

About the Speaker:

Rick Morris did his undergraduate work in philosophy at American Military University while serving in the U.S. military. After leaving active service, he did an MA at San Jose State. Rick is currently in his third year in the philosophy PhD program at University of California, Davis, where he is specializing in the philosophy of biology. He also maintains interests in moral philosophy and the philosophy of religion.

Comments are closed.